Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26471280›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Computerized patient-reported symptom assessment in radiotherapy: a pilot randomized, controlled trial.

Erik K Fromme, Emma B Holliday, Lillian M Nail, Karen S Lyons, Michelle R Hribar, Charles R Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erik K FrommeDivision of Hematology & Medical Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L586, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. frommee@ohsu.edu.
Emma B HollidayDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 78240, USA. emmaholliday@gmail.com.
Lillian M NailSchool of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Karen S LyonsSchool of Nursing, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Michelle R HribarDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Charles R ThomasDepartment of Radiation Medicine, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN HEALTH INFORMATICST15LM007088 · NLM · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM R HERSH, Vishnu Mohan · 1992 to 2026
$23.4M
Computer Assisted Symptom Management for Patients Receiving Radiation TherapyR21CA141172 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FROMME, ERIK K · 2009 to 2010
$368k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA141172NCI NIH HHS R21CA141172NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputer-based, patient-reported symptom survey tools have been described for patients undergoing chemotherapy. We hypothesized that patients undergoing radiotherapy might also benefit, so we developed a computer application to acquire symptom ratings from patients and generate summaries for use at point of care office visits and conducted a randomized, controlled pilot trial to test its feasibility.

methodsSubjects were randomized prior to beginning radiotherapy. Both control and intervention group subjects completed the computerized symptom assessment, but only for the intervention group were printed symptom summaries made available before each weekly office visit. Metrics compared included the Global Distress Index (GDI), concordance of patient-reported symptoms and symptoms discussed by the physician and numbers of new and/or adjusted symptom management medications prescribed.

resultsOne hundred twelve patients completed the study: 54 in the control and 58 in the intervention arms. There were no differences in GDI over time between the control and intervention groups. In the intervention group, more patient-reported symptoms were actually discussed in radiotherapy office visits: 46/202 vs. 19/230. A sensitivity analysis to account for within-subjects correlation yielded 23.2 vs. 10.3 % (p = 0.03). Medications were started or adjusted at 15.4 % (43/280) of control visits compared to 20.4 % (65/319) of intervention visits (p = 0.07).

conclusionsThis computer application is easy to use and makes extensive patient-reported outcome data available at the point of care. Although no differences were seen in symptom trajectory, patients who had printed symptom summaries had improved communication during office visits and a trend towards a more active symptom management during radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Pilot ProjectsAgedComputersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSymptom AssessmentCommunicationPatient-reported outcomesRadiation therapySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID26471280
PMCPMC4769076
OpenAlexW2188859135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.