Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26471180›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Evaluation of immune responses of gastric cancer patients treated by laparoscopic and open gastrectomy.

Ming Cui, Chaofan Gong, Beihai Jiang, Zhendan Yao, Lei Chen, Jiabo Di, Jiadi Xing, Hong Yang, Chenghai Zhang, Nan Zhang and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ming CuiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Chaofan GongKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Beihai JiangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Zhendan YaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Lei ChenKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jiabo DiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Jiadi XingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Hong YangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Chenghai ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Nan ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Maoxing LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Fei TanKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Zaozao WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xiangqian SuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China. suxiangqian@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer more advantages than open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. However, the perioperative immune responses after laparoscopic surgery remain largely unexplored. Here, we analyzed the immunity of gastric cancer patients treated by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) or open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 dissection. Seventy patients were randomized into LAG and OG groups. The operative details and postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared. The immune factors were measured preoperatively as well as on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days (POD). Our results indicate that there was no significant difference between two groups in clinical characteristics. The profiles of white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, as well as the lymphocyte subpopulations, including T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, CD4(+) T cells, and CD8(+) T cells were similar in the LAG and the OG groups. Only the natural killer cell counts were significantly higher in LAG-treated patients than in OG-treated ones on POD7. Moreover, no statistical differences were found between the two groups with respect to the levels of perioperative cytokines, including IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-α. However, compared with the OG group, most of the immune factors in the LAG group had trends to return to preoperative levels on POD7. Our study demonstrates that the immune function of LAG-treated patients showed patterns similar to that of OG-treated patients, although larger prospective multicenter trials are needed to further evaluate the immunological status of LAG.

Indexed as

AgedCytokinesFemaleGastrectomyHumansImmunity, CellularLaparoscopyLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeCytokinesCytokineGastrectomyGastric cancerImmune responseLaparoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.