Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26470995›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2015

Analysis of crosstalk between retinoic acid and sonic hedgehog pathways following ethanol exposure in embryonic zebrafish.

Chengjin Zhang, Ashley Anderson, Gregory J Cole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of the Hedgehog Pathway in Alcohol-Induced Birth Defects.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Zebrafish models of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Animal models of gene-alcohol interactions.Birth defects research · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gene-environment interactions in development and disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The Genetics of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengjin ZhangJulius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ashley AndersonDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Gregory J ColeJulius L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
North Carolina Central University · US

Funding

RC3 Ethanol-Cannabinoid Interaction in the Regulation of NeurogenesisU54AA019765 · NIAAA · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI COLE, GREGORY JAY · 2010 to 2019
$8.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS U54 AA019765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthanol is a teratogen affecting numerous regions of the developing nervous system. The present study was undertaken to ascertain whether ethanol independently disrupts distinct signaling pathways or rather disrupts interactive pathways that regulate development of ethanol-sensitive tissues.

methodsZebrafish embryos were exposed to ethanol in the absence or presence of aldh1a3 or Shh morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs), which disrupt retinoic acid (RA) or sonic hedgehog (Shh) function, respectively. Morphological analysis of ocular or midbrain-hindbrain boundary (MHB) development was conducted, and the ability to rescue ethanol and MO-induced phenotypes was assessed. In situ hybridization was used to analyze Pax6a expression during ocular development.

resultsChronic ethanol exposure, or combined ethanol and MO treatment, results in perturbed MHB formation and microphthalmia. While RA can rescue the MHB phenotype following ethanol combined with either MO, Shh mRNA is unable to rescue the disrupted MHB with combined ethanol and aldh1a3 MO treatment. RA also is unable to rescue microphthalmia induced by ethanol and Shh MO.

conclusionThese studies demonstrate that while reduction of either RA or Shh signaling produces the same disruption of MHB or ocular development, that can be phenocopied using ethanol combined with either MO, RA overexpression can only rescue disrupted MHB, but not microphthalmia, in combined subthreshold Shh MO and ethanol. Our data suggest that MHB development may involve crosstalk between RA and Shh signaling, while ocular development depends on RA and Shh signaling that both are targets of ethanol in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders but do not depend on a mechanism involving crosstalk.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainEthanolEyeEye ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionTretinoinZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsEthanolEye ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsShha protein, zebrafishTretinoinZebrafish ProteinsFASDmicrophthalmiaretinoic acidsonic hedgehogzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID26470995
PMCPMC4697881
OpenAlexW1901264013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.