Trial reportTrials2015
The three stages of building and testing mid-level theories in a realist RCT: a theoretical and methodological case-example.
Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Theory-Based Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence Among Patients With Hypertension in Primary Healthcare and the Community: A Systematic Review.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Pooled it
- Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Health professional-delivered obesity prevention interventions during the first 1,000 days: A systematic review of external validity reporting.HRB open research · 2019Pooled it
- A realist evaluation approach to explaining the role of context in the impact of a complex eHealth intervention for improving prevention of cardiovascular disease.BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- A critical realist evaluation of a music therapy intervention in palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2017Trial
- A Comparison of Methods for Testing and Implementing Community Health Interventions in Childhood: A Realist Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- School-based group interpersonal therapy for adolescents with depression in nepal: protocol for a phase III realist cluster-randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Assessing a Person-Centered and Culturally Sensitive Intervention for Arabic-, Turkish, or Urdu-Speaking Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Guidelines for evaluating and reporting social isolation and loneliness interventions.Journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Reducing LGBTQ+ adolescent mental health inequalities: a realist review of school-based interventions.Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) · 2024Review
- Article
- Development of a program theory for osteoporosis patient education in Denmark: a qualitative study based on realist evaluation.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Theoretically derived interventions aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in primary care: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Review
- Participants' Perceptions of Essential Coaching for Every Mother-a Canadian Text Message-Based Postpartum Program: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Article
- Process evaluation of a community mobilization intervention for preventing men's partner violence use in peri-urban South Africa.Evaluation and program planning · 2020Article
- The Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Psychological Well-Being in the Workplace: A Systematic Review Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Designing an intervention to improve sexual health service use among university undergraduate students: a mixed methods study guided by the behaviour change wheel.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- A Critical Realist Translational Social Epidemiology Protocol for Concretising and Contextualising a "Theory of Neighbourhood Context, Stress, Depression, and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)", Sydney Australia.International journal of integrated care · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) of social interventions are often criticised as failing to open the 'black box' whereby they only address questions about 'what works' without explaining the underlying processes of implementation and mechanisms of action, and how these vary by contextual characteristics of person and place. Realist RCTs are proposed as an approach to evaluation science that addresses these gaps while preserving the strengths of RCTs in providing evidence with strong internal validity in estimating effects.
methodsIn the context of growing interest in designing and conducting realist trials, there is an urgent need to offer a worked example to provide guidance on how such an approach might be practically taken forward. The aim of this paper is to outline a three-staged theoretical and methodological process of undertaking a realist RCT using the example of the evaluation of a whole-school restorative intervention aiming to reduce aggression and bullying in English secondary schools. DISCUSSION: First, informed by the findings of our initial pilot trial and sociological theory, we elaborate our theory of change and specific a priori hypotheses about how intervention mechanisms interact with context to produce outcomes. Second, we describe how we will use emerging findings from the integral process evaluation within the RCT to refine, and add to, these a priori hypotheses before the collection of quantitative, follow-up data. Third, we will test our hypotheses using a combination of process and outcome data via quantitative analyses of effect mediation (examining mechanisms) and moderation (examining contextual contingencies). The results are then used to refine and further develop the theory of change.
conclusionThe aim of the realist RCT approach is thus not merely to assess whether the intervention is effective or not, but to develop empirically informed mid-range theory through a three-stage process. There are important implications for those involved with reporting and reviewing RCTs, including the use of new, iterative protocols.
trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN10751359 (Registered 11 March 2014).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.