Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26470706›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2015

Assessment of cytotoxicity exerted by leaf extracts from plants of the genus Rhododendron towards epidermal keratinocytes and intestine epithelial cells.

Ahmed Rezk, Alaa Al-Hashimi, Warren John, Hartwig Schepker, Matthias S Ullrich, Klaudia Brix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioactivity inFrontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
  11. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed RezkDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759, Bremen, Germany. ah.rezk@jacobs-university.de.
Alaa Al-HashimiDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759, Bremen, Germany. al.alhashimi@yahoo.com.
Warren JohnDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759, Bremen, Germany. w.john@jacobs-university.de.
Hartwig SchepkerStiftung Bremer Rhododendronpark, Deliusweg 40, D-28359, Bremen, Germany. schepker@rhododendronpark-bremen.de.
Matthias S UllrichDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759, Bremen, Germany. m.ullrich@jacobs-university.de.
Klaudia BrixDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, D-28759, Bremen, Germany. k.brix@jacobs-university.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhododendron leaf extracts were previously found to exert antimicrobial activities against a range of Gram-positive bacteria. In this study, we investigated which of the extracts with these antimicrobial properties would be best suited for further exploitation. Specifically, the project aims to identify biologically active compounds that affect bacterial but not mammalian cells when applied in medical treatments such as lotions for ectopic application onto skin, or as orally administered drugs.

methodsDifferent concentrations of DMSO-dissolved remnants of crude methanol Rhododendron leaf extracts were incubated for 24 h with cultured epidermal keratinocytes (human HaCaT cell line) and epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa (rat IEC6 cell line) and tested for their cytotoxic potential. In particular, the cytotoxic potencies of the compounds contained in antimicrobial Rhododendron leaf extracts were assessed by quantifying their effects on (i) plasma membrane integrity, (ii) cell viability and proliferation rates, (iii) cellular metabolism, (iv) cytoskeletal architecture, and (v) determining initiation of cell death pathways by morphological and biochemical means.

resultsExtracts of almost all Rhododendron species, when applied at 500 μg/mL, were potent in negatively affecting both keratinocytes and intestine epithelial cells, except material from R. hippophaeoides var. hippophaeoides. Extracts of R. minus and R. racemosum were non-toxic towards both mammalian cell types when used at 50 μg/mL, which was equivalent to their minimal inhibitory concentration against bacteria. At this concentration, leaf extracts from three other highly potent antimicrobial Rhododendron species proved non-cytotoxic against one or the other mammalian cell type: Extracts of R. ferrugineum were non-toxic towards IEC6 cells, and extracts of R. rubiginosum as well as R. concinnum did not affect HaCaT cells. In general, keratinocytes proved more resistant than intestine epithelial cells against the treatment with compounds contained in Rhododendron leaf extracts.

conclusionsWe conclude that leaf extracts from highly potent antimicrobial R. minus and R. racemosum are safe to use at 50 μg/mL in 24-h incubations with HaCaT keratinocytes and IEC6 intestine epithelial cells in monolayer cultures. Extracts from R. rubiginosum as well as R. concinnum or R. ferrugineum are applicable to either keratinocytes or intestinal epithelial cells, respectively. Beyond the scope of the current study, further experiments are required to identify the specific compounds contained in those Rhododendron leaf extracts that exert antimicrobial activity while being non-cytotoxic when applied onto human skin or gastrointestinal tract mucosa. Thus, this study supports the notion that detailed phytochemical profiling and compound identification is needed for characterization of the leaf extracts from specific Rhododendron species in order to exploit their components as supplementary agents in antimicrobial phyto-medical treatments.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsCell MembraneCell SurvivalEpithelial CellsGram-Positive BacteriaHumansIntestinesKeratinocytesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ExtractsPlant LeavesRhododendronAnti-Infective AgentsPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID26470706
PMCPMC4608053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.