Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26470023›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Healthcare Associated Infections of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Case-Control-Control Study.

Zhenjiang Yao, Yang Peng, Xiaofeng Chen, Jiaqi Bi, Ying Li, Xiaohua Ye, Jing Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hospital-Acquired Methicillin-resistantHawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenjiang YaoDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang PengDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaofeng ChenDivision of Infectious Diseases, The People's Hospital of Meizhou, Meizhou, China.
Jiaqi BiDepartment of Environmental and School Health, Shajing Health Inspection Institute, Shenzhen, China.
Ying LiDivision of Environmental Health, Public Health Laboratory Center, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohua YeDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing ShiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China.
Guangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNHebei University of Chinese Medicine · CNMeizhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most widespread and dangerous pathogens in healthcare settings. We carried out this case-control-control study at a tertiary care hospital in Guangzhou, China, to examine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, risk factors and clinical outcomes of MRSA infections.

methodsA total of 57 MRSA patients, 116 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) patients and 102 S. aureus negative patients were included in this study. We applied the disk diffusion method to compare the antimicrobial susceptibilities of 18 antibiotics between MRSA and MSSA isolates. Risk factors of MRSA infections were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. We used Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression analysis to assess the hospital stay duration and fatality for patients with MRSA infections.

resultsThe MRSA group had significantly higher resistance rates for most drugs tested compared with the MSSA group. Using MSSA patients as controls, the following independent risk factors of MRSA infections were identified: 3 or more prior hospitalizations (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8, P = 0.007), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.7-20.7, P = 0.006), and use of a respirator (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.0-12.9, P = 0.046). With the S. aureus negative patients as controls, use of a respirator (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.0-13.9, P = 0.047) and tracheal intubation (OR 8.2, 95% CI 1.5-45.1, P = 0.016) were significant risk factors for MRSA infections. MRSA patients had a longer hospital stay duration and higher fatality in comparison with those in the two control groups.

conclusionsMRSA infections substantially increase hospital stay duration and fatality. Thus, MRSA infections are serious issues in this healthcare setting and should receive more attention from clinicians.

Indexed as

Length of StayAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesChinaCross InfectionDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansLogistic ModelsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRisk FactorsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusTertiary Care CentersAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26470023
PMCPMC4607165
OpenAlexW2223951801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.