Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26469915›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Decoding Tumor Phenotypes for ALK, ROS1, and RET Fusions in Lung Adenocarcinoma Using a Radiomics Approach.

Hyun Jung Yoon, Insuk Sohn, Jong Ho Cho, Ho Yun Lee, Jae-Hun Kim, Yoon-La Choi, Hyeseung Kim, Genehee Lee, Kyung Soo Lee, Jhingook Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyun Jung YoonFrom the Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (HJY, HYL, J-HK, KSL); Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (IS, HK); Department of Thoracic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (JHC, JK); Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (Y-LC); Department of Nursing, Lung and Esophageal Cancer Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, Samsumg Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (GL); and Department of Radiology, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (HJY).
Insuk Sohn
Jong Ho Cho
Ho Yun Lee
Jae-Hun Kim
Yoon-La Choi
Hyeseung Kim
Genehee Lee
Kyung Soo Lee
Jhingook Kim
Samsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative imaging using radiomics can capture distinct phenotypic differences between tumors and may have predictive power for certain phenotypes according to specific genetic mutations. We aimed to identify the clinicoradiologic predictors of tumors with ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase), ROS1 (c-ros oncogene 1), or RET (rearranged during transfection) fusions in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.A total of 539 pathologically confirmed lung adenocarcinomas were included in this retrospective study. The baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were retrieved from the patients' medical records and the ALK/ROS1/RET fusion status was reviewed. Quantitative computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography imaging characteristics were evaluated using a radiomics approach. Significant features for the fusion-positive tumor prediction model were extracted from all of the clinicoradiologic features, and were used to calculate diagnostic performance for predicting 3 fusions' positivity. The clinicoradiologic features were compared between ALK versus ROS1/RET fusion-positive tumors to identify the clinicoradiologic similarity between the 2 groups.The fusion-positive tumor prediction model was a combination of younger age, advanced tumor stage, solid tumor on CT, higher values for SUV(max) and tumor mass, lower values for kurtosis and inverse variance on 3-voxel distance than those of fusion-negative tumors (sensitivity and specificity, 0.73 and 0.70, respectively). ALK fusion-positive tumors were significantly different in tumor stage, central location, SUV(max), homogeneity on 1-, 2-, and 3-voxel distances, and sum mean on 2-voxel distance compared with ROS1/RET fusion-positive tumors.ALK/ROS1/RET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas possess certain clinical and imaging features that enable good discrimination of fusion-positive from fusion-negative lung adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOncogene Proteins, FusionPhenotypePositron-Emission TomographyALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseFluorodeoxyglucose F18Oncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesRET protein, humanROS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26469915
PMCPMC4616787
OpenAlexW2313906428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.