Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26469707›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Differential Predictive Roles of A- and B-Type Nuclear Lamins in Prostate Cancer Progression.

Irena Saarinen, Tuomas Mirtti, Heikki Seikkula, Peter J Boström, Pekka Taimen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Knockdown ofCell adhesion & migration · 2023
    Article
  8. LMNB1, a potential marker for early prostate cancer progression.American journal of cancer research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Long Noncoding RNAFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irena SaarinenDepartment of Pathology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; MediCity, Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Tuomas MirttiDepartment of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital and Finnish Institute for Molecular Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Heikki SeikkulaDepartment of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pekka TaimenDepartment of Pathology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland; MediCity, Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among men in western countries. While active surveillance is increasingly utilized, the majority of patients are currently treated with radical prostatectomy. In order to avoid over-treatment, there is an indisputable need for reliable biomarkers to identify the potentially aggressive and lethal cases. Nuclear intermediate filament proteins called lamins play a role in chromatin organization, gene expression and cell stiffness. The expression of lamin A is associated with poor outcome in colorectal cancer but to date the prognostic value of the lamins has not been tested in other solid tumors.

methodsWe studied the expression of different lamins with immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray material of 501 PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection. Patients were divided into two staining categories (low and high expression). The correlation of lamin expression with clinicopathological variables was tested and the association of lamin status with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and disease specific survival (DSS) was further analyzed.

resultsLow expression of lamin A associated with lymph node positivity (p<0.01) but not with other clinicopathological variables and low expression had a borderline independent significant association with DSS (HR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-1.0; p = 0.052). Similarly, low lamin C expression associated with poorer survival (HR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1-0.6; p = 0.004). Lamin B1 expression did not associate with clinicopathological variables but high expression independently predicted BCR in multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-2.9; p = 0.023). Low expression of lamin B2 correlated with lymph node positivity (p<0.01) and predicted unfavorable DSS (HR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-1.0; p = 0.047).

conclusionsThese results suggest differential roles for lamins in PCa progression. Reduced amounts of lamin A/C and B2 increase risk for lymph node metastasis and disease specific death possibly through increased nuclear deformability while high expression of lamin B1 predicts disease recurrence.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinomaCell NucleusDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionHumansImmunohistochemistryLamin Type ALamin Type BMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisLamin Type ALamin Type B

Identifiers

PMID26469707
PMCPMC4607298
OpenAlexW2338524367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.