Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26469046›Full record

ReviewNature2015

Gene therapy returns to centre stage.

Luigi Naldini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 467 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
467citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

467 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Recombinant Human Adenovirus-Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Preparation of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Gene Delivery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Epigenetic regulation of transgenes.Journal of biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

407 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Luigi NaldiniSan Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (TIGET), San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Funding

Telethon TGT11D02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent clinical trials of gene therapy have shown remarkable therapeutic benefits and an excellent safety record. They provide evidence for the long-sought promise of gene therapy to deliver 'cures' for some otherwise terminal or severely disabling conditions. Behind these advances lie improved vector designs that enable the safe delivery of therapeutic genes to specific cells. Technologies for editing genes and correcting inherited mutations, the engagement of stem cells to regenerate tissues and the effective exploitation of powerful immune responses to fight cancer are also contributing to the revitalization of gene therapy.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGene TargetingGenetic TherapyHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansImmunotherapyLiverNeoplasmsOrgan SpecificityT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID26469046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.