Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468502›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical microbiology2015

Recognition of Streptococcus pseudoporcinus Colonization in Women as a Consequence of Using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Group B Streptococcus Identification.

Nuntra Suwantarat, Maureen Grundy, Mayer Rubin, Renee Harris, Jo-Anne Miller, Mark Romagnoli, Ann Hanlon, Tsigereda Tekle, Brandon C Ellis, Frank R Witter and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Le infezioni in medicina · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. First report of infective endocarditis caused byNew microbes and new infections · 2020
    Article
  8. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Brief Case: Too Beta To Be a "B".Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nuntra SuwantaratDivision of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Chulabhorn International College of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand nsuwantarat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-2592
Maureen GrundyDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mayer RubinMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Renee HarrisMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jo-Anne MillerMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mark RomagnoliMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ann HanlonMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tsigereda TekleMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Brandon C EllisMicrobiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Frank R WitterDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Karen C CarrollDivision of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Microbiology Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During a 14-month period of using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for group B streptococcus (GBS) identification, we recovered 32 (1%) Streptococcus pseudoporcinus isolates from 3,276 GBS screening cultures from female genital sources (25 isolates from pregnant women and 7 from nonpregnant women). An additional two S. pseudoporcinus isolates were identified from a urine culture and a posthysterectomy wound culture. These isolates were found to cross-react with three different GBS antigen agglutination kits, PathoDx (Remel) (93%), Prolex (Pro-Lab Diagnostics) (38%), and Streptex (Remel) (53%). New approaches to bacterial identification in routine clinical microbiology laboratories may affect the prevalence of S. pseudoporcinus.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgglutination TestsBacteriological TechniquesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcusYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26468502
PMCPMC4652085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.