Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468382›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2015

Female Sexual Health Training for Oncology Providers: New Applications.

Lynn Y Wang, Annette Pierdomenico, Abbe Lefkowitz, Rachael Brandt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05729672 (Developing and Testing a Small Private Online Course), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05729672 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Testing a Small Private Online Course (SPOC) for Nurse-patient Communication About Sex.

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2017 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsNurse-Patient RelationsArmsReceived the Nightingale in Gen-sEx course
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Discussing Sexual Health in the Medical Oncologist's Practice: Exploring Current Practice and Challenges.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fex-Talk: a Short Educational Intervention Intended to Enhance Nurses' Readiness to Discuss Fertility and Sexuality with Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn Y WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lankenau Medical Center Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Annette PierdomenicoRiddle Hospital, Comprehensive Breast Center Media, PA, USA.
Abbe LefkowitzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lankenau Medical Center Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Rachael BrandtLankenau Institute for Medical Research, Lankenau Medical Center Wynnewood, PA, USA ; Department of Oncology Programs, Lankenau Medical Center Wynnewood, PA, USA.
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research · USMain Line Health · USRiddle Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSexual health care remains an unmet need for women with cancer. Many barriers are described, such as provider discomfort and lack of training; however, there is little evidence-based guidance regarding how to effectively address these obstacles.

aimThis pilot study was performed to determine whether brief, targeted sexual health training for oncology providers results in improved provider comfort level and frequency of addressing female cancer-related sexual issues.

methodsA brief (30-45 minute), targeted sexual health training program focused on improving comfort level, knowledge and communication skills when addressing breast cancer-related sexual issues was developed by the primary author. Using a pretest-posttest format, this educational program was provided to oncology providers (physicians and nurses/other allied health) from a suburban health-care system. Surveys based on 5-point Likert scales were provided before and 3-6 month post training.

main outcome measuresPrimary endpoints were changes in mean Likert scores for provider comfort level and self-reported frequency of addressing sexual issues. A secondary endpoint was change in mean Likert scores for perception of access to sexual health resources/referrals.

resultsEligible respondents included 8 oncologists, 4 surgeons, and 62 nurses/other allied health. For total respondents, comparison of mean Likert scores for survey 1 (n = 71) and survey 2 (n = 36) demonstrated statistically significant increases for all parameters queried, including provider comfort level with bringing up (Pre mean Likert score = 3.4, Post = 4.3, P < 0.0001) and coordinating care (Pre = 3.5, Post = 4.6, P < 0.0001), and frequency of addressing sexual issues for both diagnosis/treatment and surveillance phase (Pre = 2.4, Post = 3.3, P ≤ 0.0052).

conclusionBrief, targeted sexual health training for oncology providers positively correlated with improved provider comfort level and frequency of addressing female cancer-related sexual issues.

Indexed as

Breast CancerEducationFemale Sexual HealthNursesOncologistsSexual DysfunctionSexual Health Training

Identifiers

PMID26468382
PMCPMC4599556
OpenAlexW1870616740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.