Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468187›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

How Does the Brain Implement Adaptive Decision Making to Eat?

Valérie Compan, B Timothy Walsh, Walter Kaye, Allan Geliebter

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain serotonin, oxytocin, and their interaction: Relevance for eating disorders.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. WAY-208466, a 5-HTNeuroscience applied · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hunger improves reinforcement-driven but not planned action.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valérie CompanNîmes University, Place Gabriel Peri, Carmes, 30021 Nîmes, France, valerie.compan@unimes.fr.
B Timothy WalshNew York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032.
Walter KayeEating Disorder Treatment and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, La Jolla, California 92037.
Allan GeliebterDepartment of Psychiatry, Montana Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, and Department of Psychology, Touro College and University System, New York, New York 10023.

Funding

Neurobiology of Feeding &Other Behaviors in BulimiaR01MH042984 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAYE, WALTER H · 1988 to 2013
$6.3M
Translational Research on Eating Disorders: Reward SystemsR01MH079397 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI WALSH, B. TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS MH79397NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH042984NIMH NIH HHS R01MH042984NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079397PHS HHS NIDDK080153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive decision making to eat is crucial for survival, but in anorexia nervosa, the brain persistently supports reduced food intake despite a growing need for energy. How the brain persists in reducing food intake, sometimes even to the point of death and despite the evolution of multiple mechanisms to ensure survival by governing adaptive eating behaviors, remains mysterious. Neural substrates belong to the reward-habit system, which could differ among the eating disorders. The present review provides an overview of neural circuitry of restrictive food choice, binge eating, and the contribution of specific serotonin receptors. One possibility is that restrictive food intake critically engages goal-directed (decision making) systems and "habit," supporting the view that persistent caloric restriction mimics some aspects of addiction to drugs of abuse. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: An improved understanding of the neural basis of eating disorders is a timely challenge because these disorders can be deadly. Up to 70 million of people in the world suffer from eating disorders. Anorexia nervosa affects 1-4% of women in United States and is the first cause of death among adolescents in Europe. Studies relying on animal models suggest that decision making to eat (or not) can prevail over actual energy requirements due to emotional disturbances resulting in abnormal habitual behavior, mimicking dependence. These recent studies provide a foundation for developing more specific and effective interventions for these disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDecision MakingFeeding BehaviorHumansRewardanorexiadecision makingdependenceobesityrewardserotonin

Identifiers

PMID26468187
PMCPMC4604225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.