ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015
Transcriptomic Approaches to Neural Repair.
Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics technologies: Novel tools and methods for assessing nerve injury and regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Global trends in machine learning applications for single-cell transcriptomics research.Hereditas · 2025Article
- Role and Interplay of Different Signaling Pathways Involved in Sciatic Nerve Regeneration.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2024Review
- Spinal cord injury regulates circular RNA expression in axons.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Neuronal Redevelopment and the Regeneration of Neuromodulatory Axons in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- Transcriptome of rat subcortical white matter and spinal cord after spinal injury and cortical stimulation.Scientific data · 2021Article
- Potential roles of stem cell marker genes in axon regeneration.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2021Review
- Catecholaminergic axons in the neocortex of adult mice regrow following brain injury.Experimental neurology · 2020Article
- Effect of lesion proximity on the regenerative response of long descending propriospinal neurons after spinal transection injury.BMC neuroscience · 2019Article
- Brainstem-Evoked Transcription of Defensive Genes After Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Schwann cells regulate sensory neuron gene expression before and after peripheral nerve injury.Glia · 2018Article
- Precise temporal regulation of alternative splicing during neural development.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Phenotypic screening with primary neurons to identify drug targets for regeneration and degeneration.Molecular and cellular neurosciences · 2017Review
- Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis of Neural Stem Cells.Current pharmacology reports · 2017Article
- Effect of VEGF on Inflammatory Regulation, Neural Survival, and Functional Improvement in Rats following a Complete Spinal Cord Transection.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
- Effects of Electroacupuncture at Governor Vessel Acupoints on Neurotrophin-3 in Rats with Experimental Spinal Cord Injury.Neural plasticity · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding why adult CNS neurons fail to regenerate their axons following injury remains a central challenge of neuroscience research. A more complete appreciation of the biological mechanisms shaping the injured nervous system is a crucial prerequisite for the development of robust therapies to promote neural repair. Historically, the identification of regeneration associated signaling pathways has been impeded by the limitations of available genetic and molecular tools. As we progress into an era in which the high-throughput interrogation of gene expression is commonplace and our knowledge base of interactome data is rapidly expanding, we can now begin to assemble a more comprehensive view of the complex biology governing axon regeneration. Here, we highlight current and ongoing work featuring transcriptomic approaches toward the discovery of novel molecular mechanisms that can be manipulated to promote neural repair. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Transcriptional profiling is a powerful technique with broad applications in the field of neuroscience. Recent advances such as single-cell transcriptomics, CNS cell type-specific and developmental stage-specific expression libraries are rapidly enhancing the power of transcriptomics for neuroscience applications. However, extracting biologically meaningful information from large transcriptomic datasets remains a formidable challenge. This mini-symposium will highlight current work using transcriptomic approaches to identify regulatory networks in the injured nervous system. We will discuss analytical strategies for transcriptomics data, the significance of noncoding RNA networks, and the utility of multiomic data integration. Though the studies featured here specifically focus on neural repair, the approaches highlighted in this mini-symposium will be of broad interest and utility to neuroscientists working in diverse areas of the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.