Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468184›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

New Perspectives for the Rescue of Cognitive Disability in Down Syndrome.

Renata Bartesaghi, Tarik F Haydar, Jean Maurice Delabar, Mara Dierssen, Carmen Martínez-Cué, Diana W Bianchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Enhanced Dendritic Inhibition and Impaired NMDAR Activation in a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Arizona Cognitive Test Battery for Down Syndrome: Test-Retest Reliability and Practice Effects.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mouse models of Down syndrome: gene content and consequences.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Renata BartesaghiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1640-0995
Tarik F HaydarDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6772-3076
Jean Maurice DelabarUnit of Functional and Adaptative Biology, University Paris Diderot, Paris 75013, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-0921
Mara DierssenCenter for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, and Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona 08003, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-6865
Carmen Martínez-CuéDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Cantabria, Santander 39011, Spain, and.
Diana W BianchiMother Infant Research Institute, Floating Hospital for Children and Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 dbianchi@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9270-5267
Boston University · USDélégation Paris 7 · FRTufts University · USUniversidad de Cantabria · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is a relatively common genetic condition caused by the triplication of human chromosome 21. No therapies currently exist for the rescue of neurocognitive impairment in DS. This review presents exciting findings showing that it is possible to restore brain development and cognitive performance in mouse models of DS with therapies that can also apply to humans. This knowledge provides a potential breakthrough for the prevention of intellectual disability in DS.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosomes, Human, Pair 21Cognition DisordersDisease Models, AnimalDown SyndromeHumansMicebrain abnormalitiesDown syndromeintellectual disabilitymouse modelspreventive therapies

Identifiers

PMID26468184
PMCPMC6608177
OpenAlexW2263251102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.