Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468181›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Genomic Views of Transcriptional Enhancers: Essential Determinants of Cellular Identity and Activity-Dependent Responses in the CNS.

Jesse M Gray, Tae-Kyung Kim, Anne E West, Alex S Nord, Eirene Markenscoff-Papadimitriou, Stavros Lomvardas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hallmarks of Brain Plasticity.Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Invited Review: Epigenetics in neurodevelopment.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  11. Signatures of sex: Sex differences in gene expression in the vertebrate brain.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Genetic and epigenetic editing in
nervous system
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  14. The chromatin landscape of neuronal plasticity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Redefining the IBDs using genome-scale molecular phenotyping.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jesse M GrayDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, gray@genetics.med.harvard.edu.
Tae-Kyung KimDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390.
Anne E WestDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Alex S NordDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, California 95616.
Eirene Markenscoff-PapadimitriouDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, and.
Stavros LomvardasDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10027.
Columbia University · USDuke University Hospital · USHarvard University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The algorithms used by the genome to interpret neural activityR01MH101528 · NIMH · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI GRAY, JESSE MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
The epigenetic mechanism of enhancer RNA in behavioral plasticityR01NS085418 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KIM, TAE-KYUNG · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101528NIMH NIH HHS R01MH101528NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085418NINDS NIH HHS R01NS085418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sprinkled throughout the genome are a million regulatory sequences called transcriptional enhancers that activate gene promoters in the right cells, at the right time. Enhancers endow the brain with its incredible diversity of cell types and also translate neural activity into gene induction. Thanks to rapid advances in genomic technologies, it is now possible to identify thousands of enhancers rapidly, test their transcriptional function en masse, and address their neurobiological functions via genome editing. Enhancers also promise to be a great technological opportunity for neuroscience, offering the potential for cell-type-specific genetic labeling and manipulation without the need for transgenesis. The objective of this review and the accompanying 2015 SfN mini-symposium is to highlight the use of new and emerging genomic technologies to probe enhancer function in the nervous system. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Transcriptional enhancers turn on genes in the right cells, at the right time. Enhancers are also the genomic sequences that encode the incredible diversity of cell types in the brain and enable the brain to turn genes on in response to new experiences. New technology enables enhancers to be found and manipulated. The study of enhancers promises to inform our understanding of brain development and function. The application of enhancer technology holds promise in accelerating basic neuroscience research and enabling gene therapies to be targeted to specific cell types in the brain.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsCentral Nervous SystemEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene ExpressionHumansModels, BiologicalPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID26468181
PMCPMC4604220
OpenAlexW2230326311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.