Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26468076›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Fidelity considerations in translational research: Eating As Treatment - a stepped wedge, randomised controlled trial of a dietitian delivered behaviour change counselling intervention for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Alison Kate Beck, Amanda Baker, Ben Britton, Chris Wratten, Judith Bauer, Luke Wolfenden, Gregory Carter

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Adherence to intensive nutrition care in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Intervention Fidelity and Facilitator Training.Western journal of nursing research · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alison Kate BeckCentre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Alison.Beck@newcastle.edu.au.
Amanda BakerCentre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Amanda.Baker@newcastle.edu.au.
Ben BrittonCentre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Ben.Britton@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Chris WrattenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW, 2308, Australia. Chris.Wratten@calvarymater.org.au.
Judith BauerCentre for Dietetics Research, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. j.bauer1@uq.edu.au.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. Luke.Wolfenden@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au.
Gregory CarterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW, 2308, Australia. Gregory.Carter@newcastle.edu.au.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUCalvary Mater Newcastle Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe confidence with which researchers can comment on intervention efficacy relies on evaluation and consideration of intervention fidelity. Accordingly, there have been calls to increase the transparency with which fidelity methodology is reported. Despite this, consideration and/or reporting of fidelity methods remains poor. We seek to address this gap by describing the methodology for promoting and facilitating the evaluation of intervention fidelity in The EAT (Eating As Treatment) project: a multi-site stepped wedge randomised controlled trial of a dietitian delivered behaviour change counselling intervention to improve nutrition (primary outcome) in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS/

designIn accordance with recommendations from the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium Treatment Fidelity Workgroup, we sought to maximise fidelity in this stepped wedge randomised controlled trial via strategies implemented from study design through to provider training, intervention delivery and receipt. As the EAT intervention is designed to be incorporated into standard dietetic consultations, we also address unique challenges for translational research. DISCUSSION: We offer a strong model for improving the quality of translational findings via real world application of National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium recommendations. Greater transparency in the reporting of behaviour change research is an important step in improving the progress and quality of behaviour change research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12613000320752 (Date of registration 21 March 2013).

Indexed as

CounselingDelivery of Health CareFeeding BehaviorNutritionistsResearch DesignAdultBehavior TherapyClinical ProtocolsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26468076
PMCPMC4607094
OpenAlexW2130332054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.