Trial reportBMC cancer2015
Capecitabine in combination with either cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase II study.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02604615 (Two Cycles Versus Four Cycles of Capecitabine Combined Oxaliplatin Concurrent Radiotherapy as First-line Therapy for Chinese Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas, an Open Randomised Phase III Cilinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Two Cycles Versus Four Cycles of Capecitabine Combined Oxaliplatin Concurrent Radiotherapy as First-line Therapy for Chinese Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas, an Open Randomised Phase III Cilinical Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Real-World Efficacy of Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Capecitabine and a PD-1 Inhibitor in Metastatic or Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- A discrete choice experiment to assess treatment preferences for patients with esophageal cancer in Japan.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2025Article
- Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced oesophageal cancer treated with surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Considerations to forgo systemic treatment in patients with advanced esophageal or gastric cancer: A real-world evidence study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcome of Conversion Surgery for Stage IV Esophageal Cancer Following Chemoradiation.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors of second-line nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study for 184 cases.Journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Treatment Strategies for Locoregional Recurrence in Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Azelnidipine inhibits esophageal squamous cell carcinoma proliferationMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2022Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab combination therapy in the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Cisplatin plus anti-PD-1 antibody enhanced treatment efficacy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2022Article
- Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Safety and efficacy of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Concurrent liposomal paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy improved outcomes for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of capecitabine plus cisplatin (CC) or capecitabine plus paclitaxel (CP) as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
methodsPatients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled in this open-label, phase II, randomized trial. Patients were assigned to either the CC arm (days [D]1-14 capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily + D1 cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks) or the CP arm (D1-14 capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily + D1, 8 paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2), every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint of the study was response rate and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life.
resultsA total of 94 patients were entered into this study between October 2008 and October 2012, 46 patients in the CC arm and 48 in the CP arm. Patients in both arms received a median of six cycles of treatment (range, 1-14) and the response rates were 57 and 58 % in the cisplatin and paclitaxel arm, respectively. With a median follow-up of 23 months, the median PFS was 5.1 months (95 % CI 4.0-6.2 months) in the cisplatin arm and 6.7 months (95 % CI 4.9-8.5 months) in the paclitaxel arm, whereas the median OS was 10.5 months (95 % CI 9.2-11.9 months) in the cisplatin arm and 13.2 months (95 % CI 9.4-17.0 months) in the paclitaxel arm. Patients in the cisplatin arm were more likely to experience neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas patients in the paclitaxel arm had a higher frequency of neuropathy and alopecia. Quality of life was similar between treatment arms.
conclusionsBoth CC and CP regimens were effective and well tolerated as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.