Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467955›Full record

ReviewInsects2012

Insect Sex Determination Manipulated by Their Endosymbionts: Incidences, Mechanisms and Implications.

Daisuke Kageyama, Satoko Narita, Masaya Watanabe

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The regulatory role of mFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Prophage-encodedeLife · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Wolbachia: Advancing into a Second Century.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Two male-killingRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Male-killing virus in a noctuid mothProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Detection and Characterisation of EndosymbiontTropical life sciences research · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke KageyamaInsect-Microbe Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Owashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan. kagymad@affrc.go.jp.
Satoko NaritaInsect-Microbe Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Owashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan. naritas@affrc.go.jp.
Masaya WatanabeInsect-Microbe Research Unit, National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences (NIAS), Owashi 1-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan. wtnbm1ab@affrc.go.jp.
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sex-determining systems of arthropods are surprisingly diverse. Some species have male or female heterogametic sex chromosomes while other species do not have sex chromosomes. Most species are diploids but some species, including wasps, ants, thrips and mites, are haplodiploids (n in males; 2n in females). Many of the sexual aberrations, such as sexual mosaics, sex-specific lethality and conversion of sexuality, can be explained by developmental defects including double fertilization of a binucleate egg, loss of a sex chromosome or perturbation of sex-determining gene expression, which occur accidentally or are induced by certain environmental conditions. However, recent studies have revealed that such sexual aberrations can be caused by various groups of vertically-transmitted endosymbiotic microbes such as bacteria of the genera Wolbachia, Rickettsia, Arsenophonus, Spiroplasma and Cardinium, as well as microsporidian protists. In this review, we first summarize the accumulated data on endosymbiont-induced sexual aberrations, and then discuss how such endosymbionts affect the developmental system of their hosts and what kinds of ecological and evolutionary effects these endosymbionts have on their host populations.

Indexed as

endosymbiontfeminizationinsectmale killingsex determinationWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID26467955
PMCPMC4553623
OpenAlexW2053199083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.