Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467791›Full record

Trial reportProgress in orthodontics2015

Long-term clinical and bacterial effects of xylitol on patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Mohamed I Masoud, Reem Allarakia, Najlaa M Alamoudi, Romesh Nalliah, Veerasathpurush Allareddy

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in orthodontics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Is xylitol effective in the prevention of dental caries? A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohamed I MasoudDepartment of Developmental Biology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Mohamed_Masoud@hsdm.harvard.edu.
Reem AllarakiaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. masoudortho@gmail.com.
Najlaa M AlamoudiPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. nalamoudi2011@gmail.com.
Romesh NalliahCollege of Dentistry, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. romesh.aus@gmail.com.
Veerasathpurush AllareddyDepartment of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. Veerasathpurush-Allareddy@uiowa.edu.
King Abdulaziz University · SAAnn Arbor Center for Independent Living · USKing Fahd Armed Forces Hospital · SAUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical and bacterial effects of using 6 g of xylitol per day for 3 months on patients with full fixed orthodontic appliances.

methodsThe study was a pilot clinical trial that included 41 subjects who were undergoing orthodontic treatment. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups. Group A received xylitol chewing gum, group B received xylitol dissolvable chewable tablets, and Group C served as the control group and did not receive xylitol gums or tablets. Clinical examination and the collection of plaque and saliva samples were carried out at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. All three groups were given oral hygiene instruction and were put on a 6-month cleaning and topical fluoride schedule. Plaque scores and bacterial counts were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the different approaches at reducing the caries risk.

resultsXylitol groups did not experience any more reduction in plaque score, plaque MS counts, or salivary MS counts than the control group nor did they have lower values at any of the time points. Chewing gum did not significantly increase the incidence of debonded brackets over the other groups.

conclusionsXylitol does not have a clinical or bacterial benefit in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Oral hygiene instructions and 6-month topical fluoride application were effective at reducing plaque scores and bacterial counts in patients with full fixed appliances regardless of whether or not xylitol was used.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacterial LoadCariostatic AgentsChewing GumChildDental CariesDental PlaqueDental Plaque IndexDental ProphylaxisFemaleFluorides, TopicalFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleCariostatic AgentsChewing GumFluorides, TopicalTabletsXylitolBacterial countsFixed orthodontic appliancesOral hygienePlaqueXylitol

Identifiers

PMID26467791
PMCPMC4605935
OpenAlexW1896227688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.