Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467602›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

Adolescent D-amphetamine treatment in a rodent model of ADHD: Pro-cognitive effects in adolescence without an impact on cocaine cue reactivity in adulthood.

Chloe J Jordan, Danielle M Taylor, Linda P Dwoskin, Kathleen M Kantak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chloe J JordanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Danielle M TaylorDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Linda P DwoskinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Kathleen M KantakDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: kkantak@bu.edu.
Boston University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

COGNITIVE ASPECTS OF ADDICTION-RELATED BEHAVIORR01DA011716 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI KANTAK, KATHLEEN M. · 1998 to 2013
$4.8M
NIDA NIH HHS DA011716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is comorbid with cocaine abuse. Whereas initiating ADHD medication in childhood does not alter later cocaine abuse risk, initiating medication during adolescence may increase risk. Preclinical work in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) model of ADHD found that adolescent methylphenidate increased cocaine self-administration in adulthood, suggesting a need to identify alternatively efficacious medications for teens with ADHD. We examined effects of adolescent d-amphetamine treatment on strategy set shifting performance during adolescence and on cocaine self-administration and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior (cue reactivity) during adulthood in male SHR, Wistar-Kyoto (inbred control), and Wistar (outbred control) rats. During the set shift phase, adolescent SHR needed more trials and had a longer latency to reach criterion, made more regressive errors and trial omissions, and exhibited slower and more variable lever press reaction times. d-Amphetamine improved performance only in SHR by increasing choice accuracy and decreasing errors and latency to criterion. In adulthood, SHR self-administered more cocaine, made more cocaine-seeking responses, and took longer to extinguish lever responding than control strains. Adolescent d-amphetamine did not alter cocaine self-administration in adult rats of any strain, but reduced cocaine seeking during the first of seven reinstatement test sessions in adult SHR. These findings highlight utility of SHR in modeling cognitive dysfunction and comorbid cocaine abuse in ADHD. Unlike methylphenidate, d-amphetamine improved several aspects of flexible learning in adolescent SHR and did not increase cocaine intake or cue reactivity in adult SHR. Thus, adolescent d-amphetamine was superior to methylphenidate in this ADHD model.

Indexed as

AgingAmphetamineAnimalsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCentral Nervous System StimulantsChoice BehaviorCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersCuesDisease Models, AnimalDopamine Uptake InhibitorsMalePsychotropic DrugsRats, Inbred SHRRats, Inbred WKYRats, WistarAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsPsychotropic DrugsAdolescenceAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorderCocaine cue reactivityd-AmphetamineSpontaneously Hypertensive RatStrategy set shifting task

Identifiers

PMID26467602
PMCPMC4679481
OpenAlexW1785968279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.