Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467518›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Bilateral reach-to-grasp movement asymmetries after human spinal cord injury.

Finnegan J Calabro, Monica A Perez

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Finnegan J CalabroDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Monica A PerezDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Systems Neuroscience Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Department of Neurological Surgery, The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, Florida perezmo@miami.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Neural Control of Bilateral Hand and Arm Movements After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS076589 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2011 to 2016
$1.6M
Enhancement of hand motor function after cervical spinal cord injuryI01RX000815 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2015 to 2018
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS-0900622NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-076589NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076589RRD VA I01 RX000815
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans typically damages both sides of the spinal cord, resulting in asymmetric functional impairments in the arms. Despite this well-accepted notion and the growing emphasis on the use of bimanual training strategies, how movement of one arm affects the motion of the contralateral arm after SCI remains unknown. Using kinematics and multichannel electromyographic (EMG) recordings we studied unilateral and bilateral reach-to-grasp movements to a small and a large cylinder in individuals with asymmetric arm impairments due to cervical SCI and age-matched control subjects. We found that the stronger arm of SCI subjects showed movement durations longer than control subjects during bilateral compared with unilateral trials. Specifically, movement duration was prolonged when opening and closing the hand when reaching for a large and a small object, respectively, accompanied by deficient activation of finger flexor and extensor muscles. In subjects with SCI interlimb coordination was reduced compared with control subjects, and individuals with lesser coordination between hands were those who showed prolonged times to open the hand. Although the weaker arm showed movement durations during bilateral compared with unilateral trials that were proportional to controls, the stronger arm was excessively delayed during bilateral reaching. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that during bilateral reach-to-grasp movements the more impaired arm has detrimental effects on hand opening and closing of the less impaired arm and that they are related, at least in part, to deficient control of EMG activity of hand muscles. We suggest that hand opening might provide a time to drive bimanual coordination adjustments after human SCI.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityMovementAdultAgedArmCase-Control StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord Injuriesbilateral movementscorticospinal drivereaching and graspingspinal cord injuryunilateral movementsvoluntary drive

Identifiers

PMID26467518
PMCPMC4760481
OpenAlexW2212641489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.