ArticleNucleic acids research2016
A deep learning framework for modeling structural features of RNA-binding protein targets.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning approaches for resolving genomic discrepancies in cancer: a systematic review and clinical perspective.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiac fibroblast deletion of PTBP1 modulates the profibrotic response by alternative splicing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Data-intensive immune network modelling for One Health.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Plant MicroRNA Research: Progress, Challenges, and Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Interpretation of RNA Universe and Coding Potential Using IntRNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Review
- Research on Plant RNA-Binding Protein Prediction Method Based on Improved Ensemble Learning.Biology · 2025Article
- RBPsuite 2.0: an updated RNA-protein binding site prediction suite with high coverage on species and proteins based on deep learning.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: a deep learning perspective.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- A Survey of Deep Learning Methods and Tools for Protein Binding Site Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- DeepFusion: A deep bimodal information fusion network for unraveling protein-RNA interactions using in vivo RNA structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- The improved de Bruijn graph for multitask learning: predicting functions, subcellular localization, and interactions of noncoding RNAs.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Big data and deep learning for RNA biology.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Novel applications of Convolutional Neural Networks in the age of Transformers.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Seq-RBPPred: Predicting RNA-Binding Proteins from Sequence.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Graphylo: A deep learning approach for predicting regulatory DNA and RNA sites from whole-genome multiple alignments.iScience · 2024Article
- Role of Optimization in RNA-Protein-Binding Prediction.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Review of Computational Methods and Database Sources for Predicting the Effects of Coding Frameshift Small Insertion and Deletion Variations.ACS omega · 2024Review
- A task-specific encoding algorithm for RNAs and RNA-associated interactions based on convolutional autoencoder.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play important roles in the post-transcriptional control of RNAs. Identifying RBP binding sites and characterizing RBP binding preferences are key steps toward understanding the basic mechanisms of the post-transcriptional gene regulation. Though numerous computational methods have been developed for modeling RBP binding preferences, discovering a complete structural representation of the RBP targets by integrating their available structural features in all three dimensions is still a challenging task. In this paper, we develop a general and flexible deep learning framework for modeling structural binding preferences and predicting binding sites of RBPs, which takes (predicted) RNA tertiary structural information into account for the first time. Our framework constructs a unified representation that characterizes the structural specificities of RBP targets in all three dimensions, which can be further used to predict novel candidate binding sites and discover potential binding motifs. Through testing on the real CLIP-seq datasets, we have demonstrated that our deep learning framework can automatically extract effective hidden structural features from the encoded raw sequence and structural profiles, and predict accurate RBP binding sites. In addition, we have conducted the first study to show that integrating the additional RNA tertiary structural features can improve the model performance in predicting RBP binding sites, especially for the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB), which also provides a new evidence to support the view that RBPs may own specific tertiary structural binding preferences. In particular, the tests on the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) segments yield satisfiable results with experimental support from the literature and further demonstrate the necessity of incorporating RNA tertiary structural information into the prediction model. The source code of our approach can be found in https://github.com/thucombio/deepnet-rbp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.