Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467427›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015

Novel phase I study combining G1 phase, S phase, and G2/M phase cell cycle inhibitors in patients with advanced malignancies.

Rajul K Jain, David S Hong, Aung Naing, Jennifer Wheler, Thorunn Helgason, Nai-Yi Shi, Yash Gad, Razelle Kurzrock

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Leukocyte subtype classification with multi-model fusion.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A novel evaluation method for Ki-67 immunostaining in paraffin-embedded tissues.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Corrigendum.2015 · Dosage error in article text
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rajul K Jaina Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
David S Honga Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
Aung Nainga Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
Jennifer Whelera Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
Thorunn Helgasona Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
Nai-Yi Shia Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) ; MD Anderson Cancer Center ; Houston , TX USA.
Yash Gadb SimVivo ; Houston , TX USA.
Razelle Kurzrockc Moores Cancer Center; University of California San Diego ; La Jolla , CA USA.
Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMoores Cancer CenterThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer is a manifestation of aberrant cellular proliferation, and the cell cycle is one of the most successfully drugged targets in oncology. No prior study has been reported that simultaneously targets the 3 principal cell cycle phases populated by proliferating cells--G1, S, and G2/M.

methodsTemsirolimus (G1 inhibitor), topotecan (S inhibitor), and bortezomib (G2/M inhibitor) were administered in combination to patients with advanced malignancies using a 3+3 dose escalation schedule to assess the safety and establish the maximum tolerated dose (primary endpoints) of this cell cycle targeting approach. An in silico pharmacodynamic model using established effects of each of these agents on the cell cycle was used to validate the regimen and to guide the dosing regimen.

resultsSixty-two subjects were enrolled. The most common adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities were cytopenias, consistent with the cell cycle targeting approach employed. All cytopenias resolved to baseline values upon holding study drug administration. The maximum tolerated dose was temsirolimus 15 mg/kg IV D1, 8, 15; topotecan 2.8 mg/m(2) IV D1, 8; and bortezomib 0.6 mg/m2 IV D1, 4, 8, 11 [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] of a 21-day cycle. In silico modeling suggests the regimen induces cell population shifts from G2/M and S phases to G1 phase and the quiescent G0 phase. Eighteen percent of subjects (11/62) achieved partial response (n = 2, serous ovarian and papillary thyroid) or stable disease for > 6 months (n = 9).

conclusionCombining drugs with inhibitory activity of G1 phase, S phase, and G2/M phase is safe and warrants further evaluation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibComputer SimulationDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleG1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleBortezomibSirolimustemsirolimusTopotecanbortezomibcell cycleoncologypharmacodynamicsphase Itemsirolimustopotecan

Identifiers

PMID26467427
PMCPMC4825574
OpenAlexW2178846700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.