Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467298›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2015

A survey of Ethiopian physicians' experiences of bedside rationing: extensive resource scarcity, tough decisions and adverse consequences.

Frehiwot Berhane Defaye, Dawit Desalegn, Marion Danis, Samia Hurst, Yemane Berhane, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Ingrid Miljeteig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frehiwot Berhane DefayeResearch Group in Global Health Priorities, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 21, 5018, Bergen, Norway. frehiwot.berhane@gmail.com.
Dawit DesalegnCollege of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. mdawitd@gmail.com.
Marion DanisDepartment of Bioethics, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA. mdanis@cc.nih.gov.
Samia HurstInstitute for Ethics, History, and the Humanities, Geneva University Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland. samia.hurst@unige.ch.
Yemane BerhaneAddis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. yemaneberhane@ethionet.et.
Ole Frithjof NorheimResearch Group in Global Health Priorities, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 21, 5018, Bergen, Norway. ole.norheim@uib.no.
Ingrid MiljeteigResearch Group in Global Health Priorities, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 21, 5018, Bergen, Norway. Ingrid.miljeteig@uib.no.

Funding

A Survey Of Physicians Regarding Ethical Dilemmas In Clinical PracticeZIACL010518 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI DANIS, MARION · 2009 to 2021
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResource scarcity in health care is a universal challenge. In high-income settings, bedside rationing is commonly discussed and debated as a means to addressing scarcity. However, little is known about physicians' experiences in resource-limited contexts in low- income countries. Here we describe physicians' experiences regarding scarcity of resources, bedside rationing, use of various strategies to save resources, and perceptions of the consequences of rationing in Ethiopia.

methodsA national survey was conducted amongst physicians from 49 public hospitals using stratified, multi-stage sampling in six regions. All physicians in the selected hospitals were invited to respond to a self-administered questionnaire. Data were weighted and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

resultsIn total, 587 physicians responded (91% response rate). The majority had experienced system-wide shortages of various types of medical services. The services most frequently reported to be in short supply, either daily or weekly, were access to surgery, specialist and intensive care units, drug prescriptions and admission to hospital (52, 49, 46, 47 and 46% respectively). The most common rationing strategies used daily or weekly were limiting laboratory tests, hospital drugs, radiological investigations and providing second best treatment (47, 47, 47 and 39% respectively). Availability of institutional or national guidelines for whom to see and treat first was lacking. Almost all respondents had witnessed different adverse consequences of resource scarcity; 54% reported seeing patients who, in their estimation, had died due to resource scarcity. Almost 9 out of 10 physicians were so troubled by limited resources that they often regretted their choice of profession.

conclusionThis study provides the first glimpses of the untold story of resource shortage and bedside rationing in Ethiopia. Physicians encounter numerous dilemmas due to resource scarcity, and they report they lack adequate guidance for how to handle them. The consequences for patients and the professionals are substantial.

Indexed as

Health Care RationingAdultDelivery of Health CareEthiopiaFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth ResourcesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPhysiciansSpecializationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26467298
PMCPMC4607248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.