ArticleDer Anaesthesist2015
[Pneumopericardium due to thorax compression : Overlooked resuscitation injury].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Chest decompression in emergency medicine and intensive care].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On postoperative day 15 after right upper lobectomy of a non-small cell lung cancer a 75-year-old patient developed bradycardia followed by asystole during hospitalization on the intensive care unit. After approximately 4 min of chest compressions, circulatory function was re-established but the patient suffered from tachycardia and required continuous vasopressor support. To exclude hypovolemia and assess contractility, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was conducted. During the TTE examination neither the intensive care physician nor the cardiologist on call could obtain usable images, which was explained by the lack of experience of both physicians with TTE. Both chest ultrasound and chest x-ray imaging did not reveal any signs of a pneumothorax. A small zone of increased transparency in the cardiac silhouette was not considered to be of pathological relevance. Slowly, the patient recovered. On the following day, a thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan showed an extensive pneumopericardium of the entire pericardium with a seam width of 3 cm. Because of the patient's clinical improvement, a decision for a conservative therapeutic approach was made and 24 h later the seam width was reduced to 2 cm and 9 days later it was no longer detectable. After a total stay of 24 days in the intensive care unit the patient was transferred to a long-term pulmonary care weaning facility. In retrospect, the pneumopericardium as a rare resuscitation injury was the cause for the poor TTE conditions and was overlooked due to a fixation error, because too much attention had been focused only on the detection of a pneumothorax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.