Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26467038›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2016

Comparison of the analgesic effect between continuous wound infiltration and single-injection transversus abdominis plane block after gynecologic laparotomy.

Kunihisa Hotta, Soichiro Inoue, Koki Taira, Naho Sata, Kenji Tamai, Mamoru Takeuchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03870685 (Surgical Site Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Transversus Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine in Patients With Suspected or Known Gynecologic Cancer Undergoing Laparotomy Via Midline Incision), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03870685 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Surgical Site Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Transversus Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine in Patients With Suspected or Known Gynecologic Cancer Undergoing Laparotomy Via Midline Incision

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanbury HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled43ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Opioid UseArmsTAP Block, Surgical Site Infiltration, Exparel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kunihisa HottaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan. hottak@jichi.ac.jp.
Soichiro InoueDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Koki TairaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Naho SataDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Kenji TamaiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Mamoru TakeuchiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan.
Jichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBoth single-injection transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and continuous wound infiltration (CWI) provide postoperative analgesia, but no study has compared the two regional techniques. We tested the hypothesis that CWI is more effective for controlling postoperative pain compared with single-injection TAP block after laparotomy.

methodsWe conducted a prospective randomized study of patients undergoing gynecologic laparotomy with midline incision through the umbilicus under general anesthesia. The patients were allocated to receive either single-injection TAP block (TAP group) or CWI (CWI group) for postoperative analgesia. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine and intravenous flurbiprofen twice daily after surgery. Postoperative pain at rest and on coughing, postoperative morphine consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus and urinary retention, ambulation, and satisfaction score were recorded. Patients were assessed at 3 h after surgery and twice daily on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2.

resultsData of 54 patients were analyzed. Compared to the TAP group (n = 27), pain score on coughing was significantly lower in the CWI group (n = 27) on POD1 and POD2 (P < 0.05). Pain score on coughing at 3 h after surgery, pain score at rest at all assessed time points, morphine consumption, incidence of PONV, pruritus and urinary retention, ambulation, and satisfaction score were not different between the two groups.

conclusionCWI reduced pain on coughing after the day of surgery compared with single-injection TAP block when performed as part of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing gynecologic laparotomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansInjectionsLaparotomyMiddle AgedMorphineNerve BlockPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineAbdominal surgeryContinuous wound infiltrationPostoperative analgesiaTransversus abdominis plane block

Identifiers

PMID26467038
OpenAlexW1740103287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.