ArticleThe EMBO journal2015
When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record.
Article in The EMBO journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethics statements in Rheumatology journals: present practices and future directions.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- The epidemiology of errors in data capture, management, and analysis: A scoping review of retracted articles and retraction notices in clinical and translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- How to avoid mistakes in science publications.EMBO reports · 2023Article
- Infantile Neurodegeneration Results from Mutants of 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 10 Rather Than Aβ-Binding Alcohol Dehydrogenase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Amending the literature through version control.Biology letters · 2023Article
- 3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA and Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activities of Mitochondrial Type 10 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase in Neurodegeneration Study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.Journal for general philosophy of science = Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie · 2022Article
- Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice.Research integrity and peer review · 2021Article
- Reproducible image handling and analysis.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- Self-correction prevents withdrawal syndrome.The EMBO journal · 2019Article
- Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and Publishers.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016Review
- Authentication: A Standard Problem or a Problem of Standards?PLoS biology · 2016Article
- Reproducibility blues.The EMBO journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.