Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466908›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Chronic pain self-management support with pain science education and exercise (COMMENCE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Jordan Miller, Joy C MacDermid, David M Walton, Julie Richardson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02422459 (Chronic Pain Self-Management Support With Pain Education and Exercise), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02422459 nacompletednot on this map

Chronic Pain Self-Management Support With Pain Education and Exercise (COMMENCE): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2013 to 2016Enrolled102ConditionsChronic PainArmsCOMMENCE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinician's Commentary on Maharaj et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan MillerSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Ontario, Canada. millerjd@mcmaster.ca.
Joy C MacDermidSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Ontario, Canada. macderj@mcmaster.ca.
David M WaltonSchool of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. dwalton5@uwo.ca.
Julie RichardsonSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, 1400 Main St. W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Ontario, Canada. jrichard@mcmaster.ca.
Western University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research suggests that self-management programs for people with chronic pain improve knowledge and self-efficacy but result in negligible effects on function. This study will investigate the effectiveness self-management support with pain science education and exercise on improving function for people with chronic pain in comparison to a wait-list control. A secondary objective is to determine which variables help to predict response to the intervention. METHODS/

designThis study will be an unblinded, randomized controlled trial with 110 participants comparing a 6-week program that includes self-management support, pain science education and exercise to a wait-list control. The primary outcome will be function measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment - Dysfunction Index. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity measured by a numeric pain rating scale, pain interference measured by the eight-item PROMIS pain interference item-bank, how much patients are bothered by functional problems measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment - Bother Index, catastrophic thinking measured by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, fear of movement/re-injury measured by the 11-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, sense of perceived injustice measured by the Injustice Experience Questionnaire, self-efficacy measured by the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, pain sensitivity measured by pressure pain threshold and cold sensitivity testing, fatigue measured by a numeric fatigue rating scale, pain neurophysiology knowledge measured by the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire, healthcare utilization measured by number of visits to a healthcare provider, and work status. Assessments will be completed at baseline, 7 and 18 weeks. After the 18-week assessment, the groups will crossover; however, we anticipate carry-over effects with the treatment. Therefore, data from after the crossover will be used to estimate within-group changes and to determine predictors of response that are not for direct between-group comparisons. Mixed effects modelling will be used to determine between-group differences for all primary and secondary outcomes. A series of multiple regression models will be used to determine predictors of treatment response. DISCUSSION: This study has the potential to inform future self-management programming through evaluation of a self-management program that aims to improve function as the primary outcome.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02422459 , registered on 13 April 2015.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Education as TopicSelf CareChronic PainClinical ProtocolsCost of IllnessCross-Over StudiesHumansOntarioPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPain ThresholdResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26466908
PMCPMC4606963
OpenAlexW1929488291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.