ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2015
Requirements for more effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Participatory Ergonomic Interventions on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Sick Absenteeism, and Work Performance Among Nurses: Systematic Review.JMIR human factors · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers in the automobile manufacturing industry in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2023Pooled it
- The Role of Psychological Wellbeing in a Cross-Provider Worksite Healthcare Management Program for Employees with Musculoskeletal Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- Yoga complemented cognitive behavioral therapy on job burnout among teachers of children with autism spectrum disorders.Medicine · 2021Trial
- Beyond risk reduction of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The CoWork musculoskeletal health model.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2026Article
- Task-Dependent Effectiveness of a Quasi-Direct-Drive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton: Shoulder Muscle Offloading Versus Metabolic Cost in Overhead Work.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Participatory Ergonomics Intervention to Reduce Musculoskeletal and Stress-Related Mental Health Risks in Australian Retail Workers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders: A prospective cohort study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Review
- Effects of psychosocial factors on Swedish waste collectors musculoskeletal pain through the mediating roles of occupational fatigue and physical demands: a structural equation model.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Wellbeing for young elite musicians: development of a health protocol from a student perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- A participatory ergonomics intervention to re-design work and improve the musculoskeletal health of paramedics: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Article
- Employees Working from Home: Do Leadership Factors Influence Work-Related Stress and Musculoskeletal Pain?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Ergonomists' experiences of executing occupational health surveillance for workers exposed to hand-intensive work: a qualitative exploration.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Age Factor in the Analysis of Occupational Risks in the Wood Industry.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Defining a "Safe System of Work".Safety and health at work · 2021Article
- Working at Home: The Impacts of COVID 19 on Health, Family-Work-Life Conflict, Gender, and Parental Responsibilities.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021Article
- Low back and neck pain: objective and subjective measures of workplace psychosocial and physical hazards.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExposures to occupational hazards substantially increase workers' risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and can exacerbate pre-existing disorders. The effects on MSD risk of the physical requirements of work performance are well recognised, but there is now ample evidence that work-related psychosocial hazards can also have substantial effects; further, some hazards may be additive or interactive. This evidence is not reflected in current workplace risk management practices. DISCUSSION: Barriers to more effective workplace management of MSD risk include: the widespread belief that risk arises largely or entirely from physical hazard exposures; regulatory and guidance documents targeting MSDs, most of which reflect this belief; risk assessment tools that focus narrowly on subsets of mainly physical hazards and yet generate outputs in the form of MSD risk indicators; and the conventional occupational health and safety (OHS) risk management paradigm, which is ill-suited to manage MSD risk. It is argued that improved workplace management of MSD risk requires a systems-based management framework and more holistic risk assessment and control procedures that address risk from all types of hazard together rather than in isolation from each other, and that support participation by workers themselves. New MSD risk management tools are needed to meet these requirements. Further, successful implementation of such changes is likely to require some restructuring of workplace responsibilities for MSD risk management. Line managers and supervisors often play key roles in generating hazards, both physical and psychosocial, so there is a need for their more active participation, along with OHS personnel and workers themselves, in routine risk assessment and control procedures. MSDs are one of our largest OHS problems, but workplace risk management procedures do not reflect current evidence concerning their work-related causes. Inadequate attention is given to assessing and controlling risk from psychosocial hazards, and the conventional risk management paradigm focuses too narrowly on risk from individual hazards rather than promoting the more holistic approach needed to manage the combined effects of all relevant hazards. Achievement of such changes requires new MSD risk management tools and better integration of the roles of OHS personnel with those of line managers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.