Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466815›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2015

Finely Tuned Temporal and Spatial Delivery of GDNF Promotes Enhanced Nerve Regeneration in a Long Nerve Defect Model.

Laura M Marquardt, Xueping Ee, Nisha Iyer, Daniel Hunter, Susan E Mackinnon, Matthew D Wood, Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Decellularization of Nervous Tissues and Clinical Application.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. GDNF Gene Therapy to Repair the Injured Peripheral Nerve.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Imaging in the repair of peripheral nerve injury.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Tissue Models for Neurogenesis and Repair in 3D.Advanced functional materials · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura M Marquardt1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis, Missouri.
Xueping Ee2 Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri.
Nisha Iyer1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis, Missouri.
Daniel Hunter2 Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri.
Susan E Mackinnon2 Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri.
Matthew D Wood2 Divison of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri.
Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis , St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Translational NeuroscienceP30NS057105 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOLTZMAN, DAVID M. · 2006 to 2011
$8.7M
THE EFFECTS OF GDNF ON PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATIONR01NS051706 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, SUSAN E, SAKIYAMA-ELBERT, SHELLY ELESE · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057105NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS051706NINDS NIH HHS R01NS051706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of growth factors, such as glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), for the treatment of peripheral nerve injury has been useful in promoting axon survival and regeneration. Unfortunately, finding a method that delivers the appropriate spatial and temporal release profile to promote functional recovery has proven difficult. Some release methods result in burst release profiles too short to remain effective over the regeneration period; however, prolonged exposure to GDNF can result in axonal entrapment at the site of release. Thus, GDNF was delivered in both a spatially and temporally controlled manner using a two-phase system comprised of an affinity-based release system and conditional lentiviral GDNF overexpression from Schwann cells (SCs). Briefly, SCs were transduced with a tetracycline-inducible (Tet-On) GDNF overexpressing lentivirus before transplantation. Three-centimeter acellular nerve allografts (ANAs) were modified by injection of a GDNF-releasing fibrin scaffold under the epineurium and then used to bridge a 3 cm sciatic nerve defect. To encourage growth past the ANA, GDNF-SCs were transplanted into the distal nerve and doxycycline was administered for 4, 6, or 8 weeks to determine the optimal duration of GDNF expression in the distal nerve. Live imaging and histomorphometric analysis determined that 6 weeks of doxycycline treatment resulted in enhanced regeneration compared to 4 or 8 weeks. This enhanced regeneration resulted in increased gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscle mass for animals receiving doxycycline for 6 weeks. The results of this study demonstrate that strategies providing spatial and temporal control of delivery can improve axonal regeneration and functional muscle reinnervation.

Indexed as

LentivirusNerve RegenerationSchwann CellsTransduction, GeneticAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorMalePeripheral Nerve InjuriesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

Identifiers

PMID26466815
PMCPMC4684669
OpenAlexW1922809061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.