Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466798›Full record

ArticleInsects2013

Persistence of the Gypsy Moth Pheromone, Disparlure, in the Environment in Various Climates.

Ksenia S Onufrieva, Kevin W Thorpe, Andrea D Hickman, Donna S Leonard, E Anderson Roberts, Patrick C Tobin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. EvaluatingInsects · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ksenia S OnufrievaDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. ksenia@vt.edu.
Kevin W ThorpeHart Road Spencer, NY 14883, USA. kthorpe11@gmail.com.
Andrea D HickmanDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. anhickma@vt.edu.
Donna S LeonardUSDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Asheville, NC 28802, USA. dleonard@fs.fed.us.
E Anderson RobertsDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. roberts@vt.edu.
Patrick C TobinUSDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. ptobin@fs.fed.us.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mating disruption techniques are used in pest control for many species of insects, yet little is known regarding the environmental persistence of these pheromones following their application and if persistence is affected by climatic conditions. We first studied the persistent effect of ground applications of Luretape® GM in Lymantria dispar (L) mating disruption in VA, USA in 2006. The removal of Luretape® GM indicated that the strong persistent effect of disparlure in the environment reported by previous studies is produced by residual pheromone in the dispensers as opposed to environmental contamination. In 2010 and 2011, we evaluated the efficacy of two formulations, Disrupt® II and SPLAT GM(TM), in VA and WI, USA, which presented different climatic conditions. In plots treated in WI and VA, male moth catches in pheromone-baited traps were reduced in the year of treatment and one year after the pheromone applications relative to untreated controls. However, similar first- and second-year effects of pheromone treatments in VA and WI suggest that the release rate over one and two years was the same across markedly different climates. Future applications that use liquid or biodegradable formulations of synthetic pheromones could reduce the amount of persistence in the environment.

Indexed as

environmental persistenceLymantria disparmating disruptionpheromone

Identifiers

PMID26466798
PMCPMC4553432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.