Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466788›Full record

Trial reportAddiction science & clinical practice2015

Substance use disorder treatment retention and completion: a prospective study of horse-assisted therapy (HAT) for young adults.

Ann Kern-Godal, Espen Ajo Arnevik, Espen Walderhaug, Edle Ravndal

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Young adults' reasons for dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment.Qualitative social work : QSW : research and practice · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Contribution of the patient-horse relationship to substance use disorder treatment: Patients' experiences.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Kern-GodalDepartment of Addiction Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 21, Building 22, 0424, Oslo, Norway. ann@godal.com.
Espen Ajo ArnevikDepartment of Addiction Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 21, Building 22, 0424, Oslo, Norway. esarne@ous-hf.no.
Espen WalderhaugDepartment of Addiction Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 21, Building 22, 0424, Oslo, Norway. espwal@ous-hf.no.
Edle RavndalNorwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. edle.ravndal@medisin.uio.no.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKeeping substance use disorder patients actively engaged in treatment is a challenge. Horse-assisted therapy (HAT) is increasingly used as a complementary therapy, with claimed motivational and other benefits to physical and psychological health. This naturalistic study aimed to assess HAT's impact on the duration and completion of treatment for young substance users at Oslo University Hospital.

methodsDischarge and other data were derived from the Youth Addiction Treatment Evaluation Project (YATEP) database for patients (n = 108) admitted during an 18-month period. An intention-to-treat design, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare those receiving treatment as usual (n = 43) with those who received treatment as usual plus HAT (n = 65).

resultsDespite a lack of randomization, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. However, more HAT participants completed treatment (56.9 vs 14 %, p < 0.001), remained in treatment for longer (mean 141 vs 70 days, p < 0.001) and had a significantly higher chance of completing their treatment than those not given the HAT program. Excluding time in treatment, and after controlling for the potentially confounding influence of age, sex, education, number and severity of substances used, psychological distress and number of temporary exits, the adjusted odds ratio for treatment completion was 8.4 in the HAT group compared with those not participating in HAT (95 % CI 2.7-26.4, p < 0.001).

conclusionThe study found a statistically significant association between HAT participation and time in treatment, and between HAT participation and completion of treatment. This association does not infer causality. However, it adds supporting evidence for the development of an innovative therapy, and warrants investment in further research in relation to its inclusion in substance use disorder treatment.

Indexed as

HorsesAdolescentAdultAnimalsComplementary TherapiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthNorwayPatient DischargeProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSubstance-Related DisordersTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26466788
PMCPMC4672500
OpenAlexW1898147108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.