ArticleBMC genetics2015
Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome Selection for Fleece Traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats Based on GWAS Prior Marker Information.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats by Integrating GWAS Prior Information.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Genomic predictions for growth and feed efficiency traits in a duck breeding population.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Variable selection strategies for genomic prediction of growth and carcass related traits in experimental Nellore cattle herds under different selection criteria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genomic selection: Essence, applications, and prospects.The plant genome · 2025Review
- Genomic prediction in a backcross population using relationship matrices.Archives animal breeding · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction of Semen Traits in Boars Incorporating Biological Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genomic Selection for Live Weight in the 14th Month in Alpine Merino Sheep Combining GWAS Information.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Genetic dissection and genomic prediction for pork cuts and carcass morphology traits in pig.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Single-Trait and Multiple-Trait Genomic Prediction From Multi-Class Bayesian Alphabet Models Using Biological Information.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Unraveling genomic associations with feed efficiency and body weight traits in chickens through an integrative approach.BMC genetics · 2019Article
- Genomic Prediction Including SNP-Specific Variance Predictors.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Co-Expression Network Analysis Identifies miRNA⁻mRNA Networks Potentially Regulating Milk Traits and Blood Metabolites.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Foliar Terpene Traits inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Genomic Prediction of Complex Phenotypes Using Genic Similarity Based Relatedness Matrix.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Genome-wide associations for multiple pest resistances in a Northwestern United States elite spring wheat panel.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Genome wide association study and genomic prediction for fatty acid composition in Chinese Simmental beef cattle using high density SNP array.BMC genomics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, with the development of high-throughput sequencing technology and the commercial availability of genotyping bead chips, more attention is being directed towards the utilization of abundant genetic markers in animal and plant breeding programs, human disease risk prediction and personal medicine. Several useful approaches to accomplish genomic prediction have been developed and used widely, but still have room for improvement to gain more accuracy. In this study, an improved Bayesian approach, termed BayesBπ, which differs from the original BayesB in priors assigning, is proposed. An effective method for calculating the locus-specific π by converting p-values from association between SNPs and traits' phenotypes is given and systemically validated using a German Holstein dairy cattle population. Furthermore, the new method is applied to a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) dataset.
resultsCompared with the original BayesB, BayesBπ can improve the accuracy of genomic prediction up to 7.62% for milk fat percentage, a trait which shows a large effect of quantitative trait loci (QTL). For milk yield, which is controlled by small to moderate effect genes, the accuracy of genomic prediction can be improved up to 4.94%. For somatic cell score, of which no large effect QTL has been reported, GBLUP performs better than Bayesian methods. BayesBπ outperforms BayesCπ in 10 out of 12 scenarios in the dairy cattle population, especially in small to moderate population sizes where accuracy of BayesCπ are dramatically low. Results of the loblolly pine dataset show that BayesBπ outperforms BayesB in 14 out of 17 traits and BayesCπ in 8 out of 17 traits, respectively.
conclusionsFor traits controlled by large effect genes, BayesBπ can improve the accuracy of genomic prediction and unbiasedness of BayesB in moderate size populations. Knowledge of traits' genetic architectures can be integrated into practices of genomic prediction by assigning locus-specific priors to markers, which will help Bayesian approaches perform better in variable selection and marker effects shrinkage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.