Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466540›Full record

ReviewInsects2012

Eicosanoids: Exploiting Insect Immunity to Improve Biological Control Programs.

David Stanley, Eric Haas, Jon Miller

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional Analysis ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbial Toxins in Insect and Nematode Pest Biocontrol.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Infection ofFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses ofFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recent Advances in the Use ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. RNAseq Analysis of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David StanleyBiological Control of Insects Research Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, 1503 S. Providence Rd., Columbia, MO 65203, USA. David.Stanley@ars.usda.gov.
Eric HaasDepartment of Chemistry, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA. erichaas@creighton.edu.
Jon MillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. jsmiller@niu.edu.
Biological Control of Insects Research Laboratory · USCreighton University · USNorthern Illinois University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects, like all invertebrates, express robust innate, but not adaptive, immune reactions to infection and invasion. Insect immunity is usually resolved into three major components. The integument serves as a physical barrier to infections. Within the hemocoel, the circulating hemocytes are the temporal first line of defense, responsible for clearing the majority of infecting bacterial cells from circulation. Specific cellular defenses include phagocytosis, microaggregation of hemocytes with adhering bacteria, nodulation and encapsulation. Infections also stimulate the humoral component of immunity, which involves the induced expression of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides and activation of prophenoloxidase. These peptides appear in the hemolymph of challenged insects 6-12 hours after the challenge. Prostaglandins and other eicosanoids are crucial mediators of innate immune responses. Eicosanoid biosynthesis is stimulated by infection in insects. Inhibition of eicosanoid biosynthesis lethally renders experimental insects unable to clear bacterial infection from hemolymph. Eicosanoids mediate specific cell actions, including phagocytosis, microaggregation, nodulation, hemocyte migration, hemocyte spreading and the release of prophenoloxidase from oenocytoids. Some invaders have evolved mechanisms to suppress insect immunity; a few of them suppress immunity by targeting the first step in the eicosanoid biosynthesis pathways, the enzyme phospholipase A₂. We proposed research designed to cripple insect immunity as a technology to improve biological control of insects. We used dsRNA to silence insect genes encoding phospholipase A₂, and thereby inhibited the nodulation reaction to infection. The purpose of this article is to place our view of applying dsRNA technologies into the context of eicosanoid actions in insect immunity. The long-term significance of research in this area lies in developing new pest management technologies to contribute to food security in a world with a rapidly growing human population.

Indexed as

biological controleicosanoidsinsect immunityphospholipase A2prostaglandinssignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID26466540
PMCPMC4553607
OpenAlexW1966225835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.