Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466357›Full record

ArticleDNA repair2015

Atomic force microscopy captures the initiation of methyl-directed DNA mismatch repair.

Eric A Josephs, Tianli Zheng, Piotr E Marszalek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic human MutSα-MutLα complexes compact mismatched DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  5. Molecular Spectroscopic Markers of DNA Damage.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Studying protein-DNA interactions using atomic force microscopy.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Imaging of DNA and Protein-DNA Complexes with Atomic Force Microscopy.Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric A JosephsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: eric.josephs@duke.edu.
Tianli ZhengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA; Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC 27708, USA.
Piotr E MarszalekDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Edmund T. Pratt, Jr. School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: pemar@duke.edu.

Funding

Forces and Long-Distance Coupling along DNA in the Mismatch Repair (MMR) PathwayF32GM112502 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOSEPHS, ERIC ALAN · 2014 to 2015
$106k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM112502NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM112502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Escherichia coli, errors in newly-replicated DNA, such as the incorporation of a nucleotide with a mis-paired base or an accidental insertion or deletion of nucleotides, are corrected by a methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. While the enzymology of MMR has long been established, many fundamental aspects of its mechanisms remain elusive, such as the structures, compositions, and orientations of complexes of MutS, MutL, and MutH as they initiate repair. Using atomic force microscopy, we--for the first time--record the structures and locations of individual complexes of MutS, MutL and MutH bound to DNA molecules during the initial stages of mismatch repair. This technique reveals a number of striking and unexpected structures, such as the growth and disassembly of large multimeric complexes at mismatched sites, complexes of MutS and MutL anchoring latent MutH onto hemi-methylated d(GATC) sites or bound themselves at nicks in the DNA, and complexes directly bridging mismatched and hemi-methylated d(GATC) sites by looping the DNA. The observations from these single-molecule studies provide new opportunities to resolve some of the long-standing controversies in the field and underscore the dynamic heterogeneity and versatility of MutSLH complexes in the repair process.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular ImagingMutL ProteinsMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEscherichia coli Proteinsmethyl-directed mismatch repair protein, E coliMutL protein, E coliMutL ProteinsMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesAtomic force microscopyDNA loopingMethyl-directed DNA mismatch repairMutHMutLMutS

Identifiers

PMID26466357
PMCPMC4651853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.