ArticleNMR in biomedicine2015
R1 correction in amide proton transfer imaging: indication of the influence of transcytolemmal water exchange on CEST measurements.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Creatine-weighted imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Mitigation of TRadiology advances · 2025Article
- Joint estimation of compartment-specific TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Quasi-steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer (QUASS CEST) MRI analysis enables TJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2021Article
- CEST MRI quantification procedures for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema therapy evaluation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Voxel-wise Optimization of Pseudo Voigt Profile (VOPVP) for Z-spectra fitting in chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Amide proton transfer imaging seems to provide higher diagnostic performance in post-treatment high-grade gliomas than methionine positron emission tomography.European radiology · 2018Article
- Towards the complex dependence of MTRNMR in biomedicine · 2018Article
- Increased CEST specificity for amide and fast-exchanging amine protons using exchange-dependent relaxation rate.NMR in biomedicine · 2018Article
- Chemical exchange rotation transfer imaging of intermediate-exchanging amines at 2 ppm.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
- CEST imaging of fast exchanging amine pools with corrections for competing effects at 9.4 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
- Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects.NMR in biomedicine · 2017Article
- Evaluation and comparison of diffusion MR methods for measuring apparent transcytolemmal water exchange rate constant.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging may potentially detect mobile proteins/peptides non-invasively in vivo, but its specificity may be reduced by contamination from other confounding effects such as asymmetry of non-specific magnetization transfer (MT) effects and spin-lattice relaxation with rate R1 (=1/T1). Previously reported spillover, MT and R1 correction methods were based on a two-pool model, in which the existence of multiple water compartments with heterogeneous relaxation properties in real tissues was ignored. Such simple models may not adequately represent real tissues, and thus such corrections may be unreliable. The current study investigated the effectiveness and accuracy of correcting for R1 in APT imaging via simulations and in vivo experiments using tumor-bearing rats subjected to serial injections of Gd-DTPA that produced different tissue R1 values in regions of blood-brain-barrier breakdown. The results suggest that conventional measurements of APT contrast (such as APT* and MTRasym ) may be significantly contaminated by R1 variations, while the R1 -corrected metric AREX* was found to be relatively unaffected by R1 changes over a broad range (0.4-1 Hz). Our results confirm the importance of correcting for spin-lattice relaxation effects in quantitative APT imaging, and demonstrate the reliability of using the observed tissue R1 for corrections to obtain more specific and accurate measurements of APT contrast in vivo. The results also indicate that, due to relatively fast transcytolemmal water exchange, the influence of intra- and extracellular water compartments on CEST measurements with seconds long saturation time may be ignored in tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.