ArticlePloS one2015
Autosomal and mtDNA Markers Affirm the Distinctiveness of Lions in West and Central Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Caves to the Savannah, the Mitogenome History of Modern Lions (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity of lion populations in Kenya: Evaluating past management practices and recommendations for future conservation actions.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequencing and the application of a SNP panel reveal primary evolutionary lineages and genomic variation in the lion (Panthera leo).BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genetic guidelines for translocations: Maintaining intraspecific diversity in the lion (Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Spatiotemporal Genetic Diversity of Lions Reveals the Influence of Habitat Fragmentation across Africa.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Genetic diversity, viability and conservation value of the global captive population of the Moroccan Royal lions.PloS one · 2021Article
- The evolutionary history of extinct and living lions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Article
- No longer locally extinct? Tracing the origins of a lion (Conservation genetics (Print) · 2018Article
- A genome-wide data assessment of the African lion (Panthera leo) population genetic structure and diversity in Tanzania.PloS one · 2018Article
- Phylogeographic Patterns in Africa and High Resolution Delineation of Genetic Clades in the Lion (Panthera leo).Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The Challenges and Relevance of Exploring the Genetics of North Africa's "Barbary Lion" and the Conservation of Putative Descendants in Captivity.International journal of evolutionary biology · 2016Review
- Article
- Correction: Autosomal and mtDNA Markers Affirm the Distinctiveness of Lions in West and Central Africa.PloS one · 2016Article
- Mitochondrial Haplotype Diversity in Zambian Lions: Bridging a Gap in the Biogeography of an Iconic Species.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolutionary history of a species is key for understanding the taxonomy and for the design of effective management strategies for species conservation. The knowledge about the phylogenetic position of the lion (Panthera leo) in West/Central Africa is largely based on mitochondrial markers. Previous studies using mtDNA only have shown this region to hold a distinct evolutionary lineage. In addition, anthropogenic factors have led to a strong decline in West/Central African lion numbers, thus, the conservation value of these populations is particularly high. Here, we investigate whether autosomal markers are concordant with previously described phylogeographic patterns, and confirm the unique position of the West/Central African lion. Analysis of 20 microsatellites and 1,454 bp of the mitochondrial DNA in 16 lion populations representing the entire geographic range of the species found congruence in both types of markers, identifying four clusters: 1) West/Central Africa, 2) East Africa, 3) Southern Africa and 4) India. This is not in line with the current taxonomy, as defined by the IUCN, which only recognizes an African and an Asiatic subspecies. There are no indications that genetic diversity in West/Central Africa lions is lower than in either East or Southern Africa, however, given this genetic distinction and the recent declines of lion numbers in this region, we strongly recommend prioritization of conservation projects in West/Central Africa. As the current taxonomic nomenclature does not reflect the evolutionary history of the lion, we suggest that a taxonomic revision of the lion is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.