ArticlePloS one2015
Impact of Rural Residence on Warfarin Use and Clinical Events in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Canadian Population Based Study.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional disparities in the care and outcomes of atrial fibrillation patients in a universal health care system: a population-based cohort study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Article
- Rural-urban and geographical differences in prognosis of atrial fibrillation in Finland: a nationwide cohort study.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Rural-Urban differences in Use of Rhythm Control Therapies in Patients with Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Finnish Nationwide Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Warfarin Adherence Among Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Rural Area of Dongyang, China: A Questionnaire-Based Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Article
- Social determinants of atrial fibrillation.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants uptake and an oral anticoagulation paradox.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Article
- Atrial fibrillation care in rural communities: a mixed methods study of physician and patient perspectives.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Survey of Antithrombotic Treatment in Rural Patients (>60 years) with Atrial Fibrillation in East China.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWe studied whether anticoagulant use and outcomes differed between rural versus urban Canadian non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients prior to the introduction of direct oral anticoagulant drugs.
methodsRetrospective cohort study of 25,284 adult Albertans with NVAF between April 1, 1999 and December 31, 2008.
resultsCompared to urban patients, rural patients were older (p = 0.0009) and had more comorbidities but lower bleeding risk at baseline. In the first year after NVAF diagnosis, urban patients were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR 0.82, 95%CI 0.77-0.89) or have an emergency department visit for any reason (aOR 0.61, 95%CI 0.56-0.66) but warfarin dispensation rates (72.2% vs 71.8% at 365 days, p = 0.98) and clinical outcomes were similar: 7.8% died in both groups, 3.2% rural vs. 2.8% urban had a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) (aOR 0.92, 95%CI 0.77-1.11), and 6.6% vs. 5.7% (aOR 0.93, 95%CI 0.81-1.06) had a bleed. Baseline SSE risk did not impact warfarin dispensation (73.0% in those with high vs. 72.8% in those with low CHADS2 score, p = 0.85) but patients at higher baseline bleeding risk were less likely to be using warfarin (69.2% high vs. 73.6% low HASBLED score, p<0.0001) in the first 365 days after diagnosis. In warfarin users, bleeding was more frequent (7.5% vs 6.2%, aHR 1.51 [95%CI 1.33-1.72]) but death or SSE was less frequent (7.0% vs 18.1%, aHR 0.60 [0.54-0.66]).
conclusionWarfarin use and clinical event rates did not differ between rural and urban NVAF patients in a universal access publically-funded healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.