Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26466079›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2016

DNA methylation, early life environment, and health outcomes.

Colter Mitchell, Lisa M Schneper, Daniel A Notterman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reply to Zhang: Causal identification, social networks, and biological aging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Discovery to Clinical Innovation.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2025
    Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Colter MitchellSurvey Research Center and Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lisa M SchneperDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Daniel A NottermanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.

Funding

Reciprocal Genetic-Environmental Interactions During Childhood and AdolescenceR01HD076592 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI NOTTERMAN, DANIEL A. · 2013 to 2023
$6.8M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sarah A. Burgard · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047879NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetics, and especially DNA methylation, have recently become provocative biological explanations for early-life environmental effects on later health. Despite the large increase in papers on the topic over the last few years, many questions remain with regards to the biological feasibility of this mechanism and the strength of the evidence to date. In this review, we examine the literature on early-life effects on epigenetic patterns, with special emphasis on social environmental influences. First, we review the basic biology of epigenetic modification of DNA and debate the role of early-life stressful, protective, and positive environments on gene-specific, system-specific, and whole-genome epigenetic patterns later in life. Second, we compare the epigenetic literatures of both humans and other animals and review the research linking epigenetic patterns to health in order to complete the mechanistic pathway. Third, we discuss physical environmental and social environmental effects, which have to date, generally not been jointly considered. Finally, we close with a discussion of the current state of the area's research, its future direction, and its potential use in pediatric health.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationSocial EnvironmentChildChild HealthEpigenesis, GeneticHumansInfant

Identifiers

PMID26466079
PMCPMC4798238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.