Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465986›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2015

Emergency Department Visits for Adverse Events Related to Dietary Supplements.

Andrew I Geller, Nadine Shehab, Nina J Weidle, Maribeth C Lovegrove, Beverly J Wolpert, Babgaleh B Timbo, Robert P Mozersky, Daniel S Budnitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
189citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
102.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

189 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 482 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insights into dietary supplements as popular product supporting the diet.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew I GellerFrom the Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (A.I.G., N.S., M.C.L., D.S.B.), and Chenega Government Consulting (N.J.W.) - both in Atlanta; and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition and the Division of Public Health Informatics and Analytics (B.J.W., B.B.T.) and the Division of Dietary Supplement Programs (R.P.M.), Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD.
Nadine Shehab
Nina J Weidle
Maribeth C Lovegrove
Beverly J Wolpert
Babgaleh B Timbo
Robert P Mozersky
Daniel S Budnitz
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · UG

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary supplements, such as herbal or complementary nutritional products and micronutrients (vitamins and minerals), are commonly used in the United States, yet national data on adverse effects are limited.

methodsWe used nationally representative surveillance data from 63 emergency departments obtained from 2004 through 2013 to describe visits to U.S. emergency departments because of adverse events related to dietary supplements.

resultsOn the basis of 3667 cases, we estimated that 23,005 (95% confidence interval [CI], 18,611 to 27,398) emergency department visits per year were attributed to adverse events related to dietary supplements. These visits resulted in an estimated 2154 hospitalizations (95% CI, 1342 to 2967) annually. Such visits frequently involved young adults between the ages of 20 and 34 years (28.0% of visits; 95% CI, 25.1 to 30.8) and unsupervised children (21.2% of visits; 95% CI, 18.4 to 24.0). After the exclusion of unsupervised ingestion of dietary supplements by children, 65.9% (95% CI, 63.2 to 68.5) of emergency department visits for single-supplement-related adverse events involved herbal or complementary nutritional products; 31.8% (95% CI, 29.2 to 34.3) involved micronutrients. Herbal or complementary nutritional products for weight loss (25.5%; 95% CI, 23.1 to 27.9) and increased energy (10.0%; 95% CI, 8.0 to 11.9) were commonly implicated. Weight-loss or energy products caused 71.8% (95% CI, 67.6 to 76.1) of supplement-related adverse events involving palpitations, chest pain, or tachycardia, and 58.0% (95% CI, 52.2 to 63.7) involved persons 20 to 34 years of age. Among adults 65 years of age or older, choking or pill-induced dysphagia or globus caused 37.6% (95% CI, 29.1 to 46.2) of all emergency department visits for supplement-related adverse events; micronutrients were implicated in 83.1% (95% CI, 73.3 to 92.9) of these visits.

conclusionsAn estimated 23,000 emergency department visits in the United States every year are attributed to adverse events related to dietary supplements. Such visits commonly involve cardiovascular manifestations from weight-loss or energy products among young adults and swallowing problems, often associated with micronutrients, among older adults. (Funded by the Department of Health and Human Services.).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionCalciumChildChild, PreschoolComplementary TherapiesDietary SupplementsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansIronMicronutrientsMiddle AgedCalciumIronMicronutrientsPotassium

Identifiers

PMID26465986
PMCPMC6196363
OpenAlexW2330664058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.