ArticleCambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees2016
Germline Modification and the Burden of Human Existence.
Article in Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The ethics of clinical applications of germline genome modification: a systematic review of reasons.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2018Pooled it
- Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023Article
- The human genome as the common heritage of humanity.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques, the Non-Identity Problem, and Genetic Parenthood.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Human genome editing: how to prevent rogue actors.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Human germline editing in the era of CRISPR-Cas: risk and uncertainty, inter-generational responsibility, therapeutic legitimacy.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- The Promise of CRISPR for Human Germline Editing and the Perils of "Playing God".The CRISPR journal · 2020Article
- The 'serious' factor in germline modification.Journal of medical ethics · 2019Article
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?Journal of medical ethics · 2018Article
- Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: reproductive freedom and genetic kinship.Journal of medical ethics · 2018Article
- Genome editing and assisted reproduction: curing embryos, society or prospective parents?Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2018Article
- Reasons for being in favour of or against genome modification: a survey of the Dutch general public.Human reproduction open · 2018Article
- Resource Allocation, Treatment, Disclosure, and Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2017Article
- Emerging ethical perspectives in the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats genome-editing debate.Personalized medicine · 2016Review
- CRISPR as a driving force: the Model T of biotechnology.Monash bioethics review · 2016Article
- Mitochondrial replacement techniques: egg donation, genealogy and eugenics.Monash bioethics review · 2016Review
- Early embryo mortality in natural human reproduction: What the data say.F1000Research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26465828What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.