ArticleAnnals of surgery2016
A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases: The Case for Targeted Prophylactic Intervention.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic-assisted primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a comprehensive comparative analysis of rv-TAPP, r-Rives, and r-TARUP techniques.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of smoking on ventral and inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Prophylactic mesh reinforcement for midline incisional hernia prevention: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Fascial Dehiscence and Incisional Hernia Prediction Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.World journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies.The British journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of mesh closure in preventing wound failure following emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Bioabsorbable mesh use in midline abdominal wall prophylaxis and repair achieving fascial closure: a cross-sectional review of stage of innovation.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the use of prophylactic mesh to standard midline closure in the reduction of incisional herniae.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017Pooled it
- Does onlay mesh placement in emergency laparotomy prevent incisional hernia? A prospective randomized double-blind study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Trial
- Prevention of incisional hernia with a reinforced tension line (RTL) versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies: 3-year follow-up in a randomized clinical trial.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Trial
- Genetic Susceptibility to Incisional Hernia Evaluation of Hernia Polygenic Risk Scores.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Visceral Trauma and Emergency General Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Incisional hernia prediction using machine learning models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Observational
- External validation of the Penn hernia risk calculator: an evaluation of model transportability for incisional hernia prediction in open pancreatic surgery.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- A proposed classification of incisional hernias after kidney transplantation.European radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- External validation of the IHXGboost-P model to predict incisional hernia after midline laparotomy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With the Occurrence of Incisional Hernia in Patients Undergoing Midline Laparotomy.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- External validation of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator for the prediction of surgical site infection (SSI) and its association with the postoperative occurrence of incisional hernia (IH) in midline laparotomy patients.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIncisional hernia (IH) remains a common, highly morbid, and costly complication. Modest progress has been realized in surgical technique and mesh technology; however, few advances have been achieved toward understanding risk and prevention. In light of the increasing emphasis on prevention in today's health care environment and the billions in costs for surgically treated IH, greater focus on predictive risk models is needed.
methodsAll patients undergoing gastrointestinal or gynecologic procedures from January 1, 2005 to June 1, 2013, within the University of Pennsylvania Health System were identified. Comorbidities and operative characteristics were assessed. The primary outcome was surgically treated IH after index procedures. Patients with prior hernia, less than 1-year follow-up, or emergency surgical procedures were excluded. Cox hazard regression modeling with bootstrapped validation, risk factor stratification, and assessment of model performance were conducted.
resultsA total of 12,373 patients with a 3.5% incidence of surgically treated IH (follow-up 32.2 ± 26.6 months) were identified. The cost of surgical treatment of IH and management of associated complications exceeded $17.5 million. Notable independent risk factors for IH were ostomy reversal (HR = 2.76), recent chemotherapy (HR = 2.04), bariatric surgery (HR = 1.78), smoking history (HR = 1.74), liver disease (HR = 1.60), and obesity (HR = 1.96). High-risk patients (20.6%) developed IH compared with 0.5% of low-risk patients (C-statistic = 0.78).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates an internally validated preoperative risk model of surgically treated IH after 12,000 elective, intra-abdominal procedures to provide more individualized risk counseling and to better inform evidence-based algorithms for the role of prophylactic mesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.