Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465529›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics2015

Self-organized dynamical complexity in human wakefulness and sleep: different critical brain-activity feedback for conscious and unconscious states.

Paolo Allegrini, Paolo Paradisi, Danilo Menicucci, Marco Laurino, Andrea Piarulli, Angelo Gemignani

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Relating size and functionality in human social networks through complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paolo AllegriniIstituto di Scienze della Vita, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 7, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Paolo ParadisiIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "A. Faedo" (ISTI-CNR), Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Danilo MenicucciIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica (IFC-CNR), Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Marco LaurinoIstituto di Scienze della Vita, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 7, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Andrea PiarulliPERCRO laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 7, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Angelo GemignaniIstituto di Scienze della Vita, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 7, 56127 Pisa, Italy.
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · ITIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" · IT

Funding

European Research Council 338866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Criticality reportedly describes brain dynamics. The main critical feature is the presence of scale-free neural avalanches, whose auto-organization is determined by a critical branching ratio of neural-excitation spreading. Other features, directly associated to second-order phase transitions, are: (i) scale-free-network topology of functional connectivity, stemming from suprathreshold pairwise correlations, superimposable, in waking brain activity, with that of ferromagnets at Curie temperature; (ii) temporal long-range memory associated to renewal intermittency driven by abrupt fluctuations in the order parameters, detectable in human brain via spatially distributed phase or amplitude changes in EEG activity. Herein we study intermittent events, extracted from 29 night EEG recordings, including presleep wakefulness and all phases of sleep, where different levels of mentation and consciousness are present. We show that while critical avalanching is unchanged, at least qualitatively, intermittency and functional connectivity, present during conscious phases (wakefulness and REM sleep), break down during both shallow and deep non-REM sleep. We provide a theory for fragmentation-induced intermittency breakdown and suggest that the main difference between conscious and unconscious states resides in the backwards causation, namely on the constraints that the emerging properties at large scale induce to the lower scales. In particular, while in conscious states this backwards causation induces a critical slowing down, preserving spatiotemporal correlations, in dreamless sleep we see a self-organized maintenance of moduli working in parallel. Critical avalanches are still present, and establish transient auto-organization, whose enhanced fluctuations are able to trigger sleep-protecting mechanisms that reinstate parallel activity. The plausible role of critical avalanches in dreamless sleep is to provide a rapid recovery of consciousness, if stimuli are highly arousing.

Indexed as

BrainConsciousnessElectroencephalographyFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansNeural PathwaysSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSleepUnconsciousnessWakefulness

Identifiers

PMID26465529
PMCPMC4909144
OpenAlexW2409837535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.