Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465371›Full record

ReviewRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2015

SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST FOR FUNGI: CLINICAL AND LABORATORIAL CORRELATIONS IN MEDICAL MYCOLOGY.

Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo, Marcia S C Melhem, Lucas X Bonfietti, Juan L Rodriguez-Tudela

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antifungal, anti-biofilm, and anti-hyphal properties ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Antifungal activity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Accelerating the understanding ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Anti-International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Pathogenic Drug Resistant Fungi: A Review of Mitigation Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Candidiasis and Other Emerging Yeasts.Current fungal infection reports · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Alastruey-IzquierdoNational Centre for Microbiology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, España.
Marcia S C MelhemInstituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Lucas X BonfiettiInstituto Adolfo Lutz, Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Juan L Rodriguez-TudelaGlobal Action Fund for Fungal Infections, Geneve, Switzerland.
Instituto Adolfo Lutz · BRCenter for Effective Global Action · USCentro Nacional de Microbiologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During recent decades, antifungal susceptibility testing has become standardized and nowadays has the same role of the antibacterial susceptibility testing in microbiology laboratories. American and European standards have been developed, as well as equivalent commercial systems which are more appropriate for clinical laboratories. The detection of resistant strains by means of these systems has allowed the study and understanding of the molecular basis and the mechanisms of resistance of fungal species to antifungal agents. In addition, many studies on the correlation of in vitro results with the outcome of patients have been performed, reaching the conclusion that infections caused by resistant strains have worse outcome than those caused by susceptible fungal isolates. These studies have allowed the development of interpretative breakpoints for Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., the most frequent agents of fungal infections in the world. In summary, antifungal susceptibility tests have become essential tools to guide the treatment of fungal diseases, to know the local and global disease epidemiology, and to identify resistance to antifungals.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsAspergillusCandidaDrug Resistance, FungalHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID26465371
PMCPMC4711191
OpenAlexW2172448890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.