Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465327›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Co-Positivity for Anti-dsDNA, -Nucleosome and -Histone Antibodies in Lupus Nephritis Is Indicative of High Serum Levels and Severe Nephropathy.

Jinfeng Yang, Zhaozhen Xu, Manshu Sui, Jihua Han, Lijie Sun, Xiuzhi Jia, Haiyu Zhang, Changsong Han, Xiaoming Jin, Fei Gao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jinfeng YangDept. of Immunology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China; Immunity & Infection Key laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, 150081 Harbin, China.
Zhaozhen XuDept. of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, First Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Manshu SuiDept. of Nephrology, First Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Jihua HanDept. of General Surgery, First Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Lijie SunDept. of Immunology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China; Immunity & Infection Key laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, 150081 Harbin, China.
Xiuzhi JiaDept. of Immunology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China; Immunity & Infection Key laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, 150081 Harbin, China.
Haiyu ZhangDept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.
Changsong HanDept. of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China.
Xiaoming JinDept. of Pathology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China.
Fei GaoDept. of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Second Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Yanhong LiuDept. of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Second Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Yang LiDept. of Rheumatology, Second Hospital Affiliated to Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, China.
Jianbin CaoHarbin center for disease control and prevention, 150081 Harbin, China.
Hong LingDept. of Microbiology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China.
Fengmin ZhangDept. of Microbiology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China.
Huan RenDept. of Immunology, Harbin Medical University, 150081 Harbin, China; Immunity & Infection Key laboratory of Heilongjiang Province, 150081 Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the significance of correlated autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its complication lupus nephritis (LN) in a large cohort of patients.

methodsClinical data were statistically analyzed in 1699 SLE patients with or without nephritis who were diagnosed and treated during 2002-2013 in the northeast region of China. Reactivity to a list of 16 autoantibodies was detected by the serum test Euroline ANA profile (IgG). Serum titers of the anti-nucleosome autoantibodies were measured by ELISA assays. Kidney biopsies were examined by pathologists. Immune complex deposition was identified by immunohistochemistry stain.

resultsSimultaneous positivity of anti-dsDNA, -nucleosome and -histone antibodies (3-pos) was prevalent in SLE patients with LN compared to Non-renal SLE patients (41% vs 11%, p< 0.001). Significant correlations were found between any two of the above three anti-nucleosome antibodies in LN patients. In comparison to non-3-pos cohorts, 3-pos patients with LN had significantly higher serum levels of the three antibodies and more active disease; was associated with type IV disease; suffered from more severe renal damages; received more intensive treatment and had worse disease outcome. The serum levels of these three autoantibodies in 3-pos LN patients were significantly decreased when they underwent clinical recovery.

conclusionsSimultaneous reactivity to anti-dsDNA, -nucleosome and -histone antibodies by Euroline ANA profile (IgG) may indicate severe nephropathy in patients with SLE.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutoantibodiesBiopsyChildChinaDNAFemaleHistonesHumansKidneyLupus NephritisMaleMiddle AgedAutoantibodiesDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID26465327
PMCPMC4605492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.