Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465290›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Intraoperative Fluid Restriction in Pancreatic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.

Ganapathy van Samkar, Wietse J Eshuis, Roelof J Bennink, Thomas M van Gulik, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Benedikt Preckel, Stefan de Hert, Dirk J Gouma, Markus W Hollmann, Olivier R C Busch

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimens in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Selected Clinical Parameters and Intraoperative Fluid Management of Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Implications of Intraoperative Fluid Therapy in Pancreatic Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ganapathy van SamkarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Wietse J EshuisDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Roelof J BenninkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Thomas M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcel G W DijkgraafClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stefan de HertDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk J GoumaDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Olivier R C BuschDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative fluid restriction in a variety of operations has shown improvement of: complications, recovery of gastrointestinal function and length of stay (LOS). We investigated effects of crystalloid fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery. Our hypothesis: enhanced recovery of gastrointestinal function.

methodsIn this double-blinded randomized trial, patients scheduled to undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were randomized: standard (S:10ml/kg/hr) or restricted (R:5ml/kg/hr) fluid protocols. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: gastric emptying scintigraphically assessed on postoperative day 7.

resultsIn 66 randomized patients, complications and 6-year survival were analyzed. 54 patients were analyzed in intention to treat: 24 S-group and 30 R-group. 32 patients actually underwent a PD and 16 patients had a palliative gastrojejunostomy bypass operation in the full protocol analysis. The median gastric emptying time (T½) was 104 minutes (S-group, 95% confidence interval: 74-369) versus 159 minutes (R-group, 95% confidence interval: 61-204) (P = 0.893, NS). Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 10 patients in the S-group and in 13 patients in the R-group (45% and 50%, P = 0.779, NS). The primary outcome parameter, gastric emptying time, did not show a statistically significant difference between groups.

conclusionA fluid regimen of 10ml/kg/hr or 5ml/kg/hr during pancreatic surgery did not lead to statistically significant differences in gastric emptying. A larger study would be needed to draw definite conclusions about fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery.

trial registrationISRCTN62621488.

Indexed as

Fluid TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansIsotonic SolutionsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPalliative CarePancreasPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRinger's LactateTreatment OutcomeIsotonic SolutionsRinger's Lactate

Identifiers

PMID26465290
PMCPMC4605599
OpenAlexW2198729060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.