Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465126›Full record

ArticleMedical care2015

Predicting Late-stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Receipt of Adjuvant Therapy: Applying Current Spatial Access to Care Methods in Appalachia.

Joseph Donohoe, Vince Marshall, Xi Tan, Fabian T Camacho, Roger Anderson, Rajesh Balkrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph Donohoe*Mountain-Pacific Quality Health Foundation, Helena, MT †College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI ‡School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV §Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Vince Marshall
Xi Tan
Fabian T Camacho
Roger Anderson
Rajesh Balkrishnan

Funding

Pharmacotheraphy Evaluation Tools for Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes in Rural AR21CA168479 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BALKRISHNAN, RAJESH · 2012 to 2013
$367k
NCI NIH HHS 1 R21 CA168479NCI NIH HHS R21 CA168479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method of measuring access to care has never been used to study cancer disparities in Appalachia. First, we evaluated the 2SFCA method in relation to traditional methods. We then examined the impact of access to mammography centers and primary care on late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and receipt of adjuvant hormonal therapy.

methodsCancer registries from Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina were linked with Medicare data to identify the stage of breast cancer diagnosis for Appalachia women diagnosed between 2006 and 2008. Women eligible for adjuvant therapy had stage I, II, or III diagnosis; mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery; and hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. Geographically weighted regression was used to explore nonstationarity in the demographic and spatial access predictor variables.

resultsOver 21% of 15,299 women diagnosed with breast cancer had late-stage (stages III-IV) diagnosis. Predictors included age at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR)=0.86; P<0.001], insurance status (OR=1.32; P<0.001), county primary care to population ratio (OR=0.95; P<0.001), and primary-care 2SFCA score (OR=0.96; P=0.006). Only 46.9% of eligible women received adjuvant hormonal therapy, and predictors included comorbidity status (OR=1.18; P=0.047), county economic status (OR=1.32; P=0.006), and mammography center 2SFCA scores (OR=1.12; P=0.021).

conclusionsMethodologically, the 2SFCA method offered the greatest predictive validity of the access measures examined. Substantively, rates of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis and adjuvant hormonal therapy are substandard in Appalachia.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth StatusHumansKentuckyMammographyMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaOhioPennsylvaniaSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26465126
PMCPMC4610181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.