Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26465122›Full record

ArticleMedical care2015

A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Sex on Abdominal and Fracture Pain Care.

Ammar Siddiqui, Laura Belland, Laura Rivera-Reyes, Daniel Handel, Kabir Yadav, Kennon Heard, Amanda Eisenberg, Ula Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A retrospective review of post-intubation sedation and analgesia practices in a South African private ambulance service.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ammar Siddiqui*Emergency Department, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY †Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC ‡Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA §Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO ∥Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY.
Laura Belland
Laura Rivera-Reyes
Daniel Handel
Kabir Yadav
Kennon Heard
Amanda Eisenberg
Ula Hwang
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMount Sinai Beth Israel · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Geriatric Pain Care in the Emergency DepartmentK23AG031218 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HWANG, ULA Y · 2008 to 2012
$646k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG031218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies examining sex-based disparities in emergency department (ED) pain care have been limited to a single pain condition, a single study site, and lack rigorous control for confounders.

objectiveA multicenter evaluation of the effect of sex on abdominal pain (AP) and fracture pain (FP) care outcomes. RESEARCH

designA retrospective cohort review of ED visits at 5 US hospitals in January, April, July, and October 2009. SUBJECTS: A total of 6931 patients with a final ED diagnosis of FP (n=1682) or AP (n=5249) were included. MEASURES: The primary predictor was sex. The primary outcome was time to analgesic administration. Secondary outcomes included time to medication order, and the likelihood of receiving an analgesic and change in pain scores 360 minutes after triage: Multivariable models, clustered by study site, were conducted to adjust for race, age, comorbidities, initial pain score, ED crowding, and triage acuity.

resultsOn adjusted analyses, compared with men, women with AP waited longer for analgesic administration [AP women: 112 (65-187) minutes, men: 96 (52-167) minutes, P<0.001] and ordering [women: 84 (41-160) minutes, men: 71 (32-137) minutes, P<0.001], whereas women with FP did not (Administration: P=0.360; Order: P=0.133). Compared with men, women with AP were less likely to receive analgesics in the first 90 minutes (OR=0.766; 95% CI, 0.670-0.875; P<0.001), whereas women with FP were not (P=0.357). DISCUSSION: In this multicenter study, we found that women experienced delays in analgesic administration for AP, but not for FP. Future research and interventions to decrease sex disparities in pain care should take type of pain into account.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAnalgesicsCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentFemaleFractures, BoneHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePain ManagementQuality of Health CareRetrospective StudiesSex DistributionAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID26465122
PMCPMC4610254
OpenAlexW1773567294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.