Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464966›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Amygdala Dopamine Receptors Are Required for the Destabilization of a Reconsolidating Appetitive Memory

Emiliano Merlo, Patrizia Ratano, Elena C Ilioi, Miranda A L S Robbins, Barry J Everitt, Amy L Milton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Memory Destabilization and Reconsolidation Dynamically Regulate the PKMζ Maintenance Mechanism.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Understanding the dynamic and destiny of memories.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Addictive behaviour in experimental animals: prospects for translation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. An Update on Memory Reconsolidation Updating.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. The Naturally Occurring Compound Garcinia Indica Selectively Impairs the Reconsolidation of a Cocaine-Associated Memory.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Emiliano MerloDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Patrizia RatanoDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Elena C IlioiDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Miranda A L S RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Barry J EverittDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Amy L MiltonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council G1002231Wellcome Trust 093875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disrupting maladaptive memories may provide a novel form of treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders, but little is known about the neurochemical mechanisms underlying the induction of lability, or destabilization, of a retrieved consolidated memory. Destabilization has been theoretically linked to the violation of expectations during memory retrieval, which, in turn, has been suggested to correlate with prediction error (PE). It is well-established that PE correlates with dopaminergic signaling in limbic forebrain structures that are critical for emotional learning. The basolateral amygdala is a key neural substrate for the reconsolidation of pavlovian reward-related memories, but the involvement of dopaminergic mechanisms in inducing lability of amygdala-dependent memories has not been investigated. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that dopaminergic signaling within the basolateral amygdala is required for the destabilization of appetitive pavlovian memories by investigating the effects dopaminergic and protein synthesis manipulations on appetitive memory reconsolidation in rats. Intra-amygdala administration of either the D1-selective dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 or the D2-selective dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride prevented memory destabilization at retrieval, thereby protecting the memory from the effects of an amnestic agent, the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin. These data show that dopaminergic transmission within the basolateral amygdala is required for memory labilization during appetitive memory reconsolidation.

Indexed as

amygdaladopaminereconsolidation

Identifiers

PMID26464966
PMCPMC4586917
OpenAlexW2066511876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.