Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26464860›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic diseases2014

Role of Theories in the Design of Web-Based Person-Centered Support: A Critical Analysis.

Agneta Ranerup, Carina Sparud-Lundin, Ingalill Koinberg, Ingela Skärsäter, Margaretha Jenholt-Nolbris, Marie Berg

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Agneta RanerupDepartment of applied IT, University of Gothenburg, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Carina Sparud-LundinCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ingalill KoinbergCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ingela SkärsäterCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; School of Social and Health Sciences, Halmstad University, Box 823, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden.
Margaretha Jenholt-NolbrisCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marie BergCentre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden ; School of Health Sciences, University of Borås, 501 90 Borås, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to provide a critical understanding of the role of theories and their compatibility with a person-centered approach in the design and evaluation of web-based support for the management of chronic illness. Methods. Exploration of web-based support research projects focusing on four cases: (1) preschool children aged 4-6 with bladder dysfunction and urogenital malformation; (2) young adults aged 16-25 living with mental illness; (3) women with type 1 diabetes who are pregnant or in early motherhood; and (4) women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer. Data comprised interviews with research leaders and documented plans. Analysis was performed by means of a cross-case methodology. Results. The used theories concerned design, learning, health and well-being, or transition. All web support products had been developed using a participatory design (PD). Fundamental to the technology design and evaluation of outcomes were theories focusing on learning and on health and well-being. All theories were compatible with a person-centered approach. However, a notable exception was the relatively collective character of PD and Communities of Practice. Conclusion. Our results illustrate multifaceted ways for theories to be used in the design and evaluation of web-based support.

Identifiers

PMID26464860
PMCPMC4590938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.